The author of “Car Talk” becomes a skilled driver, while Brandy learns how to farm.

The author of “Car Talk” gets to know her father, while Brandy gets to help her family.

Both gain a deeper understanding of their own abilities.

Both gain a deeper understanding of family members.

The author of “Car Talk” does what she wants to do, while Brandy does what her father tells her to.

The author of “Car Talk” thinks driving is scary, while Brandy thinks driving is fun.

The author of “Car Talk” wants to master a skill, while Brandy takes on a new responsibility.

The author of “Car Talk” is easily distracted, while Brandy pays attention when she drives.

Dad and I drove around, saying almost nothing

that now-aging permit first found its way into my eager hands

we got into the car that first time

a small plastic card verifying my right to drive

“Car Talk” describes events that occur over a longer period.

“Car Talk” describes events in the order that they happen.

“Car Talk” focuses on something a girl experiences.

“Car Talk” shows how a father offers guidance.

The father in “Car Talk” communicates by sharing stories, while the father in “Needed” communicates by giving instructions.

The father in “Car Talk” demonstrates the importance of following directions, while the father in “Needed” demonstrates a carefree approach to driving.

The father in “Car Talk” is eager to spend time with his daughter, while the father in “Needed” is hesitant about having his daughter help him.

The father in “Car Talk” is uncertain of his ability to provide instructions, while the father in “Needed” is confident when giving instructions.

making future generations aware of important cultural history

allowing tourists to visit historical sites through the Internet

using three-dimensional models to create images of landmarks

discovering sites made famous in films

The technology in “Uncovering a New Era in Archaeology” is used mainly for making people aware of sites, while the technology in “Picturing the Past for the Future” is used mainly for creating self-guided tours of sites.

The technology in “Uncovering a New Era in Archaeology” is used mainly for proving the age of sites, while the technology in “Picturing the Past for the Future” is used mainly for recording facts about sites.

The technology in “Uncovering a New Era in Archaeology” is used mainly for re-creating sites, while the technology in “Picturing the Past for the Future” is used mainly for exploring sites.

The technology in “Uncovering a New Era in Archaeology” is used mainly for locating sites, while the technology in “Picturing the Past for the Future” is used mainly for documenting sites.

Both involve the creation of websites for educational purposes.

Both require the sites to be surveyed before they are scanned.

Both require the use of satellites to locate sites.

Both involve the use of recorded images.

thought to be lost cities

built during the current century

at risk of being destroyed

located in countries around the world

“Uncovering a New Era in Archaeology” cites an expert to support the author’s claim, while “Picturing the Past for the Future” relies on examples to express the author’s opinion.

“Uncovering a New Era in Archaeology” focuses on future events, while “Picturing the Past for the Future” focuses on the past.

“Uncovering a New Era in Archaeology” focuses on one occupation, while “Picturing the Past for the Future” focuses on several different occupations.

“Uncovering a New Era in Archaeology” discusses discovering the unknown, while “Picturing the Past for the Future” focuses on protecting what is known.

The selection focuses on failures, while the poem focuses on successes.

The selection relates facts, while the poem relates a personal experience.

The selection encourages mining, while the poem discourages mining.

The selection focuses on several events, while the poem focuses on one event.

did not appeal to many people in the United States

was important to the U.S. economy

attracted miners for only a short time

did not lead to riches for most miners

Belinda Mulroney

Fred Trump

Members of the Seattle Chamber of Commerce

The Tlingit

This marked the beginning of the Klondike gold rush.

Thousands of businesspeople came to Seattle ready to offer goods and services to the prospectors.

The Seattle Chamber of Commerce moved quickly to take advantage of this upswing in the economy.

During 1898 some $10 million in gold was found in the Yukon.

News of the gold find gave people hope.

One city that was drastically changed by the discovery of gold in the Yukon was Seattle, Washington.

Before the gold rush was over, Mulroney had opened several restaurants and hotels in Dawson.

The Tlingit, people native to the area, offered their services as guides.

In “Robots on the Reef,” the problem was caused intentionally, while in “Something Fishy,” the problem was caused accidentally.

In “Robots on the Reef,” experts are seeking a permanent solution to a problem, while in “Something Fishy,” experts are looking only for a temporary solution to a problem

In “Robots on the Reef,” the problem mainly affects life in the water, while in “Something Fishy,” the problem mainly affects life on land.

In “Robots on the Reef,” scientists have a plan to solve the problem, while in “Something Fishy,” scientists still need to determine the solution to the problem.

Both are programmed to model the behavior of insects.

Both are designed to independently complete a task.

Both are meant to be used by scientists to help restore an environment.

Both assist scientists in tracking the amount of ocean life in a specific area.

how an environmental problem is a direct effect of the misuse of technology

the intended outcome of a project related to an environmental problem

how a new technology is supposed to function in a specific environment

the challenges scientists have encountered while trying to solve an environmental problem

affects the wildlife in the area

has been studied by scientists

is a significant part of an ecosystem

is used as an energy source

can use the data gathered to address problems around the world

lack the necessary support to complete their work

think the issues related to the affected ecosystems will be resolved quickly

will continue monitoring the health of the affected ecosystems