
APUSG CH 3 Quiz Prep
Quiz by Joe Pilakowski
Feel free to use or edit a copy
includes Teacher and Student dashboards
Measure skillsfrom any curriculum
Tag the questions with any skills you have. Your dashboard will track each student's mastery of each skill.
- edit the questions
- save a copy for later
- start a class game
- automatically assign follow-up activities based on students’ scores
- assign as homework
- share a link with colleagues
- print as a bubble sheet
- Q1
Precedents __________________.
are decisions that act like statutes for us to follow.
are jurisdiction.
provide lifetime tenure for judges
30s - Q2
Stare Decisis _________.
is a part of the Federalist #78
means to stand on decided cases
means to stand on future decisions
30s - Q3
Statues are _____________.
presidential decisions
laws passed by Congress or a State
court decisions
30s - Q4
Declaring acts unconstitutional is _____________.
judicial restraint
stare decisis
jurisdictional
judicial review
30s - Q5
Why is Marbury v. Madison important?
It creates our dual court system of state & federal courts
It establishes judicial review
It establishes Separation of Powers
It creates judicial restraint for judges
30s - Q6
What is the Federalist #78 about?
It created judicial activism
It established jurisdiction of the federal courts
It argued for courts to be between the people and legislatures.
30s - Q7
Lifetime tenure for federal judges __________.
was supported by the Federalist #78
is supported by Federalism
was supported by the Federalist #10
is not supported in the Constitution
30s - Q8
Judicial Restraint ____________.
gives strong support to other branches when using judicial review
is another name for stare decisis
is a writ of certiorari
30s - Q9
A Writ of Certiorari
is an order by a LOWER court to a higher court to send the case record.
is an order by a HIGHER court to lower court to send the case record.
30s - Q10
What is the Judicial System's most powerful tool (according to Mr. P!)
senatorial courtesy
judicial activism
judicial restraint
judicial review
30s