BW: Fall Semester Final

It is impossible to defend the faith when you lack thorough knowledge of the scientific evidence.

Facts can be understood to be facts only through the lens of a worldview interpretation.

When a person examines a piece of evidence, his conclusions are always formed according to both his head system (intellect) and his heart system (affections).

As long as a person has a set of beliefs and values, a metanarrative is unnecessary for his worldview.

Some people don’t have a worldview because they haven’t made a formal study of their own beliefs.

A person must look at the evidence without any presuppositions so that his bias won’t interfere with a fair analysis.

You can prove the Bible to an unbeliever when you can show him evidence that he can’t refute.

Evidence should be used to refute the unfounded claims of unbelievers.

Every intellectual reason for rejecting the faith has a heart reason behind it.

Faith is always anti-intellectual.

Religion and politics shouldn’t mix.

When religious values are excluded from the public square, conflicts can be resolved through the neutrality of human reason.

Secularists separate the sacred from the secular inconsistently.

Christians ought to distinguish between reverence and irreverence, purity and impurity.

Rather than assuming a broad area of neutrality in a so-called lower story, Christians must recognize unbiblical worldview influences everywhere.