Tag the questions with any skills you have. Your dashboard will track each student's mastery of each skill.
Q 1/3
Score 0
Established the precedent regarding right to counsel in the state courts.
30
Miranda v Arizona
Gideon v Wainwright
Furman v Georgia
Mapp v Ohio
Q 2/3
Score 0
". . . the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination."
30
Furman v Georgia
Miranda v Arizona
Mapp v Ohio
Gideon v Wainwright
Loading...
Loading...
3 questions
Q.
Established the precedent regarding right to counsel in the state courts.
1
30 sec
Q.
". . . the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination."
2
30 sec
Q.
The Court determined that evidence obtained through a search that violates the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in state courts.
