Quizalize logo
placeholder image to represent content

Contract law revision 21

Quiz by Amanda Burgess

Feel free to use or edit a copy

includes Teacher and Student dashboards

Measure skills
from any curriculum

Tag the questions with any skills you have. Your dashboard will track each student's mastery of each skill.

With a free account, teachers can
  • edit the questions
  • save a copy for later
  • start a class game
  • automatically assign follow-up activities based on students’ scores
  • assign as homework
  • share a link with colleagues
  • print as a bubble sheet

Our brand new solo games combine with your quiz, on the same screen

Correct quiz answers unlock more play!

New Quizalize solo game modes
12 questions
Show answers
  • Q1

    Which of the following is not one of the essential elements of contract?

    At least one party

    Legally enforceable rights and obligations

    Capacity

    Agreement

    30s
  • Q2
    Which case would be used when describing the term 'Invitation to Negotiate'
    Mathieson Gee v Quigley (1952)
    Fisher v Bell (1961)
    Wolf & Wolf v Forfar Potato Company (1984)
    Smith v Sim (1959)
    30s
  • Q3

    In order to create a binding contract an offer must be met with which of the following?

    Rejection

    Negotiation

    Qualified acceptance

    Unqualified acceptance

    30s
  • Q4

    Which of the following is NOT a type of misrepresentation?

    Innocent

    Accidental

    Negligent

    Fraudulent

    30s
  • Q5
    Which case would be used when discussing damages being awarded for a misrepresentation?
    Fisher v Bell (1961)
    Wolf & Wolf v Forfar Potato Company (1984)
    Smith v Sim (1959)
    Mathieson Gee v Quigley (1952)
    30s
  • Q6

    If a misrepresentation has misled the other party, and persuaded him to do something he would not have otherwise done, the contract is?

    Valid

    Void

    30s
  • Q7

    Which of the following would not be considered in order for a court to enforce a restrictive covenant

    Whether the terms of the covenant are reasonable

    Whether there were improved terms and conditions offered by the employer

    Whether there is a genuine interest to protect

    30s
  • Q8
    Which case would be used to support an answer that a court will not intervene with the terms of a restrictive covenant?
    Mathieson Gee v Quigley (1952)
    Morrison v Robertson (1908)
    Empire Meat co v Patrick (1939)
    Fisher v Bell (1961)
    30s
  • Q9
    Which case would be used to support an answer that damages may be awarded where there has been a breach of contract
    Morrison v Robertson (1908)
    Mack v Glasgow City Council (2006)
    Fisher v Bell (1961)
    Bluebell Apparel v Dickinson (1978)
    30s
  • Q10
    Which of the following is not a remedy for breach of contract?
    Specific implement
    Restrictive covenant
    Damages
    Retention
    30s
  • Q11

    Which of the following is a remedy for breach of contract?

    Consensus in idem

    Exclusion clause

    Restrictive covenant

    Specific implement

    30s
  • Q12

    Joe has agreed to buy a Georgian-period cabinet for £500, the seller then refuses the sale, what remedy might Joe use when taking action for this breach of contract?

    Performance

    Specific implement

    Action for payment

    Novation

    30s

Teachers give this quiz to your class