
Environmental Protection
QuizĀ by ŠŠµŃŃ ŠŠ°ŃŠøŠŗ
Customize this quiz to suit your class
Instantly translate to 100+ languages
Tag the questions with any skills you have. Your dashboard will track each student's mastery of each skill.
Give this quiz to my class
āWater pollution is...
a problem when too many people live on Earth
a problem of harmful gases in the air
a problem when bad chemicals pollute rivers, lakes, seas and oceans
Ā the accumulation of plastic objects in the environment
āChoose the correct answer.
Nowadays there are a lot of ___________ animals that can become extinct very soon.
Water pollution is...
Choose the correct answer.
Nowadays there are a lot of ___________ animals that can become extinct very soon.
If people _____________ action now, the environmental problems ___________ worse and more serious.
Overpopulation is a problem when too many people live on Earth.
Air pollution isĀ the accumulation of plastic objects in the environment
The greenhouse effect forces the glaciers to melt.
What do you call the rain that contains chemical waste and causes damage to plants and animals?
Water is ............... with pesticides.
Everything around us is called...
Choose the specie of flora.
Air pollution causes many diseases.
Environmental Protection ā Vocabulary Quiz (B1+) š§ 1. What does ārenewable energyā mean? a) Energy that never runs out and comes from nature š b) Energy that comes only from coal and oil c) Energy that canāt be used again d) Energy made from plastic ā
Correct answer: a) Energy that never runs out and comes from nature š š§ 2. What are āsingle-use plasticsā? a) Plastics that can be recycled many times b) Plastics used once and then thrown away šÆ c) Plastics that last forever d) Plastics used only for energy production ā
Correct answer: b) Plastics used once and then thrown away šÆ šļø 3. What is āwasteā? a) Things we eat b) Things we throw away because we donāt need them ā»ļø c) Energy from the sun d) Clean water and air ā
Correct answer: b) Things we throw away because we donāt need them ā»ļø š± 4. What does āreduceā mean in the context of environmental protection? a) To use more of something b) To make or use less of something š½ c) To destroy nature d) To create pollution ā
Correct answer: b) To make or use less of something š½ ā»ļø 5. What does ārecycleā mean? a) To use materials again instead of throwing them away b) To burn plastic waste c) To stop using energy d) To clean streets ā
Correct answer: a) To use materials again instead of throwing them away š¬ 6. Choose the correct sentence: a) We should recycle waste to protect the environment. ā
b) We should throw away all plastic bottles. c) Renewable energy is bad for nature. d) We need more single-use plastics in our cities. ā
Correct answer: a) We should recycle waste to protect the environment. šæ 7. Fill in the blank: We can ______ pollution if we use public transport and save electricity. a) recycle b) reduce c) waste d) throw ā
Correct answer: b) reduce š” 8. True or False: āSolar and wind power are examples of renewable energy.ā ā
Answer: True āļøšØ š 9. Which of these actions helps protect the environment the most? a) Using renewable energy b) Buying single-use plastics c) Producing more waste d) Throwing rubbish in the street ā
Correct answer: a) Using renewable energy š 10. Complete the sentence: People should ______ paper, glass, and plastic to keep the planet clean. a) waste b) reduce c) recycle d) ignore ā
Correct answer: c) recycle
Environmental Protection ā Vocabulary Quiz
Environmental protection and International economic law
Understand how to apply environmental protection measures within BSE
āThereās No Such Thing as Sound Scienceā by By Christie Aschwanden was a lead science writer for FiveThirtyEight. FiveThirtyEight, Science, Dec. 6, 2017 Science is being turned against itself. For decades, its twin ideals of transparency and rigor have been weaponized by those who disagree with results produced by the scientific method. Under the Trump administration, that fight has ramped up again. In a move ostensibly meant to reduce conflicts of interest, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt has removed a number of scientists from advisory panels and replaced some of them with representatives from industries that the agency regulates. Like many in the Trump administration, Pruitt has also cast doubt on the reliability of climate science. For instance, in an interview with CNBC, Pruitt said that āmeasuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do.ā Similarly, Trumpās pick to head NASA, an agency that oversees a large portion the nationās climate research, has insisted that research into human influence on climate lacks certainty, and he falsely claimed that āglobal temperatures stopped rising 10 years ago.ā Kathleen Hartnett White, Trumpās nominee to head the White House Council on Environmental Quality, said in a Senate hearing last month that she thinks we āneed to have more precise explanations of the human role and the natural roleā in climate change. The same entreaties crop up again and again: We need to root out conflicts. We need more precise evidence. What makes these arguments so powerful is that they sound quite similar to the points raised by proponents of a very different call for change thatās coming from within science. This other movement strives to produce more robust, reproducible findings. Despite having dissimilar goals, the two forces espouse principles that look surprisingly alike: Science needs to be transparent. Results and methods should be openly shared so that outside researchers can independently reproduce and validate them. The methods used to collect and analyze data should be rigorous and clear, and conclusions must be supported by evidence. These are the arguments underlying an āopen scienceā reform movement that was created, in part, as a response to a āreproducibility crisisā that has struck some fields of science.1 But theyāre also used as talking points by politicians who are working to make it more difficult for the EPA and other federal agencies to use science in their regulatory decision-making, under the guise of basing policy on āsound science.ā Scienceās virtues are being wielded against it. What distinguishes the two calls for transparency is intent: Whereas the āopen scienceā movement aims to make science more reliable, reproducible and robust, proponents of āsound scienceā have historically worked to amplify uncertainty, create doubt and undermine scientific discoveries that threaten their interests. āOur criticisms are founded in a confidence in science,ā said Steven Goodman, co-director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford and a proponent of open science. āThatās a fundamental difference ā weāre critiquing science to make it better. Others are critiquing it to devalue the approach itself.ā Calls to base public policy on āsound scienceā seem unassailable if you donāt know the termās history. The phrase was adopted by the tobacco industry in the 1990s to counteract mounting evidence linking secondhand smoke to cancer. A 1992 Environmental Protection Agency report identified secondhand smoke as a human carcinogen, and Philip Morris responded by launching an initiative to promote what it called āsound science.ā In an internal memo, Philip Morris vice president of corporate affairs Ellen Merlo wrote that the program was designed to ādiscredit the EPA report,ā āprevent states and cities, as well as businesses from passing smoking bansā and āproactivelyā pass legislation to help their cause. The sound science tactic exploits a fundamental feature of the scientific process: Science does not produce absolute certainty. Contrary to how itās sometimes represented to the public, science is not a magic wand that turns everything it touches to truth. Instead, itās a process of uncertainty reduction, much like a game of 20 Questions. Any given study can rarely answer more than one question at a time, and each study usually raises a bunch of new questions in the process of answering old ones. āScience is a process rather than an answer,ā said psychologist Alison Ledgerwood of the University of California, Davis. Every answer is provisional and subject to change in the face of new evidence. Itās not entirely correct to say that āthis study proves this fact,ā Ledgerwood said. āWe should be talking instead about how science increases or decreases our confidence in something.ā The tobacco industryās brilliant tactic was to turn this baked-in uncertainty against the scientific enterprise itself. While insisting that they merely wanted to ensure that public policy was based on sound science, tobacco companies defined the term in a way that ensured that no science could ever be sound enough. The only sound science was certain science, which is an impossible standard to achieve. āDoubt is our product,ā wrote one employee of the Brown & Williamson tobacco company in a 1969 internal memo. The note went on to say that doubt āis the best means of competing with the ābody of factāā and āestablishing a controversy.ā These strategies for undermining inconvenient science were so effective that theyāve served as a sort of playbook for industry interests ever since, said Stanford University science historian Robert Proctor. The sound science push is no longer just Philip Morris sowing doubt about the links between cigarettes and cancer. Itās also a 1998 action plan by the American Petroleum Institute, Chevron and Exxon Mobil to āinstall uncertaintyā about the link between greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Itās industry-funded groupsā late-1990s effort to question the science the EPA was using to set fine-particle-pollution air-quality standards that the industry didnāt want. And then there was the more recent effort by Dow Chemical to insist on more scientific certainty before banning a pesticide that the EPAās scientists had deemed risky to children. Now comes a move by the Trump administrationās EPA to repeal a 2015 rule on wetlands protection by disregarding particular studies. (To name just a few examples.) Doubt merchants arenāt pushing for knowledge, theyāre practicing what Proctor has dubbed āagnogenesisā ā the intentional manufacture of ignorance. This ignorance isnāt simply the absence of knowing something; itās a lack of comprehension deliberately created by agents who donāt want you to know, Proctor said.2 In the hands of doubt-makers, transparency becomes a rhetorical move. āItās really difficult as a scientist or policy maker to make a stand against transparency and openness, because well, who would be against it?ā said Karen Levy, researcher on information science at Cornell University. But at the same time, āyou can couch everything in the language of transparency and it becomes a powerful weapon.ā For instance, when the EPA was preparing to set new limits on particulate pollution in the 1990s, industry groups pushed back against the research and demanded access to primary data (including records that researchers had promised participants would remain confidential) and a reanalysis of the evidence. Their calls succeeded and a new analysis was performed. The reanalysis essentially confirmed the original conclusions, but the process of conducting it delayed the implementation of regulations and cost researchers time and money. Delay is a time-tested strategy. āGridlock is the greatest friend a global warming skeptic has,ā said Marc Morano, a prominent critic of global warming research and the executive director of ClimateDepot.com, in the documentary āMerchants of Doubtā (based on the book by the same name). Moranoās site is a project of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, which has received funding from the oil and gas industry. āWeāre the negative force. Weāre just trying to stop stuff.ā Some of these ploys are getting a fresh boost from Congress. The Data Quality Act (also known as the Information Quality Act) was reportedly written by an industry lobbyist and quietly passed as part of an appropriations bill in 2000. The rule mandates that federal agencies ensure the āquality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of informationā that they disseminate, though it does little to define what these terms mean. The law also provides a mechanism for citizens and groups to challenge information that they deem inaccurate, including science that they disagree with. āIt was passed in this very quiet way with no explicit debate about it ā that should tell you a lot about the real goals,ā Levy said. But whatās most telling about the Data Quality Act is how itās been used, Levy said. A 2004 Washington Post analysis found that in the 20 months following its implementation, the act was repeatedly used by industry groups to push back against proposed regulations and bog down the decision-making process. Instead of deploying transparency as a fundamental principle that applies to all science, these interests have used transparency as a weapon to attack very particular findings that they would like to eradicate. Now Congress is considering another way to legislate how science is used. The Honest Act, a bill sponsored by Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas,3 is another example of what Levy calls a āTrojan horseā law that uses the language of transparency as a cover to achieve other political goals. Smithās legislation would severely limit the kind of evidence the EPA could use for decision-making. Only studies whose raw data and computer codes were publicly available would be allowed for consideration. That might sound perfectly reasonable, and in many cases it is, Goodman said. But sometimes there are good reasons why researchers canāt conform to these rules, like when the data contains confidential or sensitive medical information.4 Critics, which include more than a dozen scientific organizations, argue that, in practice, the rules would prevent many studies from being considered in EPA reviews.5 It might seem like an easy task to sort good science from bad, but in reality itās not so simple. āThereās a misplaced idea that we can definitively distinguish the good from the not-good science, but itās all a matter of degree,ā said Brian Nosek, executive director of the Center for Open Science. āThere is no perfect study.ā Requiring regulators to wait until they have (nonexistent) perfect evidence is essentially āa way of saying, āWe donāt want to use evidence for our decision-making,āā Nosek said. Most scientific controversies arenāt about science at all, and once the sides are drawn, more data is unlikely to bring opponents into agreement. Michael Carolan, who researches the sociology of technology and scientific knowledge at Colorado State University, wrote in a 2008 paper about why objective knowledge is not enough to resolve environmental controversies. āWhile these controversies may appear on the surface to rest on disputed questions of fact, beneath often reside differing positions of value; values that can give shape to differing understandings of what āthe factsā are.ā Whatās needed in these cases isnāt more or better science, but mechanisms to bring those hidden values to the forefront of the discussion so that they can be debated transparently. āAs long as we continue down this unabashedly naive road about what science is, and what it is capable of doing, we will continue to fail to reach any sort of meaningful consensus on these matters,ā Carolan writes. The dispute over tobacco was never about the science of cigarettesā link to cancer. It was about whether companies have the right to sell dangerous products and, if so, what obligations they have to the consumers who purchased them. Similarly, the debate over climate change isnāt about whether our planet is heating, but about how much responsibility each country and person bears for stopping it. While researching her book āMerchants of Doubt,ā science historian Naomi Oreskes found that some of the same people who were defending the tobacco industry as scientific experts were also receiving industry money to deny the role of human activity in global warming. What these issues had in common, she realized, was that they all involved the need for government action. āNone of this is about the science. All of this is a political debate about the role of government,ā she said in the documentary. These controversies are really about values, not scientific facts, and acknowledging that would allow us to have more truthful and productive debates. What would that look like in practice? Instead of cherry-picking evidence to support a particular view (and insisting that the science points to a desired action), the various sides could lay out the values they are using to assess the evidence. For instance, in Europe, many decisions are guided by the precautionary principle ā a system that values caution in the face of uncertainty and says that when the risks are unclear, it should be up to industries to show that their products and processes are not harmful, rather than requiring the government to prove that they are harmful before they can be regulated. By contrast, U.S. agencies tend to wait for strong evidence of harm before issuing regulations. Both approaches have critics, but the difference between them comes down to priorities: Is it better to exercise caution at the risk of burdening companies and perhaps the economy, or is it more important to avoid potential economic downsides even if it means that sometimes a harmful product or industrial process goes unregulated? In other words, under what circumstances do we agree to act on a risk? How certain do we need to be that the risk is real, and how many people would need to be at risk, and how costly is it to reduce that risk? Those are moral questions, not scientific ones, and openly discussing and identifying these kinds of judgment calls would lead to a more honest debate. Science matters, and we need to do it as rigorously as possible. But science canāt tell us how risky is too risky to allow products like cigarettes or potentially harmful pesticides to be sold ā those are value judgements that only humans can make.
1. Settlements Importance of Rivers Fertile Land: The soil near rivers was great for farming, thanks to regular flooding that added nutrients. Trade and Travel: Rivers made moving things and people easy, which helped trade and communication. Protection: Rivers could act as natural barriers, making it harder for enemies to attack. Food: Rivers were full of fish and other food, adding to what people could eat. Energy: People used the river's flow to power machines, for example, grinding grain. Cleanliness: Rivers were used to wash away waste, keeping settlements cleaner. Culture: Rivers often had spiritual importance, and ceremonies and stories revolved around them. Common Geographic Features of Ancient Civilizations Mesopotamia: the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers in central Iraq Indus River Valley: the river runs in the northwestern part of India Nile River Valley: the major river of Egypt Yellow River Valley: a major river flowing through the southern part of China Rivers provided water, food, transportation, and shaped the way of life and development of these ancient civilizations. Impact of Mountains on Settlements Mountains served as barriers to early settlement due to the lack of technology to cross them. The Himalayan Mountains isolated much of India and China during their early development. Impact of Deserts on Migration Deserts posed significant challenges to people who wanted to migrate due to their harsh and unforgiving conditions. Notable deserts include the Empty Quarter in Saudi Arabia and the Sahara Desert in Africa. Changes in Migration and Cultural Blending Advancements in transportation technology post-Industrial Revolution increased cultural blending. Transportation advancements enabled global migration. Before, cultures were isolated, focusing on beliefs and local adaptations. The Industrial Revolution transformed migration and cultural blending. 2. How Humans Modify and Adapt to Their Environment Ways Humans Modify Their Environment Mining: Removing the earth's surface for precious metals. Irrigation: Diverting water for farming. Transportation: Moving goods with trains, cars, airplanes, and boats. Mining Strip mining removes large layers of the earth. Can impact the environment by removing plants and polluting water sources. Irrigation Diverting water for farming and urban development. Transportation Moving goods using trains, cars, airplanes, and boats. Human Adaptation to the Environment Adjusting to environmental conditions by changing behavior. Examples: Wearing specific clothing, using specific building materials. Human Modification of the Environment Changing the earth to meet human needs by physically altering the environment. Examples: Dams, canals, roads, bridges. Impact of Weather and Geological Events on Humans Events like earthquakes, hurricanes, and cold weather affect human settlements. Examples: Building earthquake-resistant buildings, creating levees, using ice for tourism. 3. Understanding Culture Introduction to Culture Culture refers to the way of life of a group of people who live in a particular place. It includes traditions, beliefs, values, and the way they do things. Cultural Characteristics Religious traditions Language Family values Laws Cultural characteristics make each culture unique. Cultural Representations Art Architecture Music Literature Cultural representations express a culture's creativity and show their beliefs and history to the world. Government and Culture Types of government reflect cultural beliefs and traditions. Examples: democratic republic, communist state. The way a country is governed tells a lot about its culture. Economic Systems and Cultures Economic systems reflect cultural values. Examples: bartering, modern economies (e.g., United States, China). How people earn and spend money also reflects their culture. Spread of Cultural Ideas Trade: Spreading ideas through interactions during trade. Travel: Visitors bringing new ideas. War: Conquering armies imposing beliefs. Cultural ideas spread through trade, travel, and war. Multicultural Societies Blending of multiple cultural and ethnic groups. Common in advanced societies with immigration. Multicultural societies create something new by bringing together different cultures. Cultural Adaptation Cultures can change and adapt by taking new ideas and blending them with their own traditions. Example: 'Tex-Mex' food, which blends Mexican and Texan traditions.
Slide 1 Growing Up in the 21st Century: Challenges and Opportunities Slide 2 Introduction: What Does It Mean to Grow Up? ⢠Growing up: The process of maturing physically, mentally, and emotionally ⢠Transition from childhood to adulthood ⢠Unique challenges and opportunities in the 21st century ⢠Importance of mental growth alongside physical development Slide 3 The Journey of Self-Discovery ⢠Exploring personal identity ⢠Understanding values and beliefs ⢠Developing a sense of purpose ⢠Embracing individuality while finding community Slide 4 Mental Growth: A Key Aspect of Maturity ⢠Emotional intelligence and self-awareness ⢠Critical thinking and problem-solving skills ⢠Adaptability and resilience ⢠Importance of continuous learning and personal development Slide 5 Challenges of Growing Up in the Digital Age ⢠Information overload and digital literacy ⢠Social media pressure and online identity ⢠Cyberbullying and online safety ⢠Balancing screen time with real-life experiences Slide 6 21st Century Skills for Success ⢠Technological proficiency ⢠Communication and collaboration ⢠Creativity and innovation ⢠Global awareness and cultural competence Slide 7 Navigating Relationships in a Connected World ⢠Building and maintaining friendships ⢠Romantic relationships in the digital era ⢠Family dynamics and independence ⢠Professional networking and mentorship Slide 8 Education and Career Pathways ⢠Evolving job market and emerging industries ⢠Importance of lifelong learning ⢠Balancing academic success with practical skills ⢠Exploring unconventional career paths Slide 9 Financial Literacy and Independence ⢠Understanding personal finance ⢠Budgeting and saving strategies ⢠Student loans and debt management ⢠Investing for the future Slide 10 Mental Health and Well-being ⢠Recognizing and managing stress ⢠Importance of self-care and work-life balance ⢠Seeking help and support when needed ⢠Destigmatizing mental health issues Slide 11 Physical Health in a Changing World ⢠Importance of regular exercise ⢠Nutrition and healthy eating habits ⢠Sleep hygiene and its impact on well-being ⢠Avoiding harmful substances and addictive behaviors Slide 12 Environmental Awareness and Sustainability ⢠Understanding climate change and its impacts ⢠Developing eco-friendly habits ⢠Participating in community environmental initiatives ⢠Sustainable career opportunities Slide 13 Civic Engagement and Social Responsibility ⢠Understanding political systems and processes ⢠Importance of voting and civic participation ⢠Volunteering and community service ⢠Advocating for social justice and equality Slide 14 Cultural Competence in a Global Society ⢠Appreciating diversity and inclusion ⢠Developing intercultural communication skills ⢠Opportunities for travel and cultural exchange ⢠Embracing multilingualism Slide 15 Time Management and Productivity ⢠Setting goals and priorities ⢠Effective study and work habits ⢠Balancing academics, extracurriculars, and personal life ⢠Avoiding procrastination and developing discipline Slide 16 Dealing with Failure and Setbacks ⢠Reframing failure as a learning opportunity ⢠Building resilience and grit ⢠Developing a growth mindset ⢠Seeking feedback and continuous improvement Slide 17 Technology and Ethics ⢠Understanding digital footprint and online reputation ⢠Responsible use of social media and technology ⢠Privacy concerns and data protection ⢠Ethical considerations in a tech-driven world
⢠Landscape management A landscape is the evident factor of a land, its landforms, and the combined features of natural or artificial elements. Landscape management includes maintenance and integration of physical elements, water bodies, land cover, indigenous vegetation, human elements, such as structures and buildings, and climatic conditions. ⢠Soil Preparation In the list of farming practices, soil preparation is placed second because of its importance for seed germination. Before a crop is grown, the soil is leveled and plowed a bit deeply to prepare it for the sowing of seed. After plowing, the soil loosens and develops proper aeration in the soil. ⢠Sowing Seed selection from good quality varieties is the principal step of sowing. After preparing the soil, seeds are spread over the field, called sowing. Manual and mechanical (seeders) methods of sowing can be used. Some plants, such as rice, are first grown as seedlings in a small space and later transplanted to fields. ⢠Manuring Plants need nutrients for their growth and fruit/seed production. Therefore, nutrients must be consumed at even intervals. Fertilization is the stage at which nutrients are introduced into the lands. These nutrients can be natural manure or artificial fertilizers. Decomposed products and waste of plants and animals are used as manure because of their nutrient richness. ⢠Irrigation Irrigation means supplying water to plants. Water sources can be dams, ponds, wells, canals, etc. Excessive irrigation can damage crops and lead to waterlogging. The irrigation interval and frequency must be monitored, as they vary with the crop. ⢠Weeding Unwanted plants grown alongside field crops are known as weeds. These plants are removed with the help of weed killers (weedicides), manually plucking with hands. Several weeds can be removed with better soil preparation techniques. ⢠Integrated Pest Management ⢠IPM ā Integrated Pest Management, is a successful and ecologically sensitive technique to manage pests using combined sustainable practices. IPM is a series of methods including pest assessment, decision, and control techniques ⢠Integrating Crops and Livestock Integrating crops and livestock increases the diversity and environmental sustainability of both sectors. In the meantime, it will offer opportunities to increase overall agricultural production and profitability. ⢠Storage/Selling In the end steps of agricultural practices, the resulting grains are stored in warehouses for later use and selling purposes. Therefore, better plant protection methods must be used to protect grains from rodents and insect pests. The stores should be cleaned, dried, well-fumigated, etc., before storing grains. ⢠Harvesting Among steps of farming practices, harvesting needs significant care otherwise it will result in yield reduction. When the crop reaches maturity, the cutting starts, and the produce will be stored in a dry place. This process is known as harvesting. After harvesting, manual or mechanical thrashing is done to separate grains from the plants.