অ্যাসেটস যাচাইকরণের জন্য কোনটি একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ বৈশিষ্ট্য?

সঠিক গুণমান এবং তথ্যের অখণ্ডতা

ত্রুটিযুক্ত তথ্য

স্বল্পমেয়াদি দায়

অনির্ধারিত সম্পদ

অ্যাসেটস যাচাইকরণের প্রক্রিয়ায় কোনটি একটি সাধারণ পদক্ষেপ?

ডকুমেন্টেশন পর্যালোচনা

শুধুমাত্র ব্যবহারকারীর মতামত গ্রহণ

অ্যাসেটস বিক্রি করা

অভ্যন্তরীণ অডিট সম্পাদন না করা

অ্যাসেটস যাচাইকরণে কোনটি প্রধান লক্ষ্য?

অ্যাসেটের সঠিকতা নিশ্চিত করা

অ্যাসেটস বিক্রির পরিকল্পনা করা

দ্রুত অর্থ উপার্জন করা

নতুন সম্পদ তৈরি করা

অ্যাসেটস যাচাইকরণের সময় কোন ধরনের তথ্য সংগ্রহ করা হয়?

অর্থনৈতিক রেকর্ড

অবসর পরিকল্পনা

শিক্ষাগত যোগ্যতা

ব্যক্তিগত তথ্য

অ্যাসেট যাচাইকরণে কার্যকর পদ্ধতির মধ্যে কোনটি অন্তর্ভুক্ত?

নিয়মিত অডিট পরিচালনা

একদিকে প্রতিষ্ঠান বন্ধ করা

গ্রাহকদের প্রতারণা করা

বিক্রি করা সম্পদের ওপর নজর না দেওয়া

অ্যাসেট যাচাইকরণে এর রোল কী?

ঝুঁকি ব্যবস্থাপনা উন্নত করা

সাধারণ পরিচালন আরো জটিল করা

কেবল লাভ বৃদ্ধি করা

অর্থনৈতিক তথ্য গোপন রাখা

অ্যাসেট যাচাইকরণের সময় কোন ধরনের বিপরীত পরিণতি হতে পারে?

ভুল তথ্যের ওপর ভিত্তি করে সিদ্ধান্ত নেওয়া

সঠিক পর্যালোচনা করা

গ্রাহক সন্তুষ্টি উন্নত করা

অর্থনৈতিক স্থায়িত্ব বৃদ্ধি করা

অ্যাসেট যাচাইকরণের জন্য কোন প্রক্রিয়া ব্যবহৃত হয়?

নথিপত্রের সঠিকতার যাচাই

অর্থনৈতিক বিশ্লেষণ না করা

শুধুমাত্র ব্যক্তিগত অভিজ্ঞতা অনুসরণ করা

সামগ্রী উত্পাদন করা

অ্যাসেট যাচাইকরণের জন্য কোন একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ উপাদান?

অভ্যন্তরীণ নিয়ন্ত্রণ ব্যবস্থা

অর্থ উপার্জনের নীতি

শুধুমাত্র বৈদেশিক বিনিয়োগ

কর্মচারী সুখের মাত্রা

অ্যাসেট যাচাইকরণের জন্য কোনটি একটি কার্যকর কৌশল?

সাম্প্রতিক বাজারমূল্যের তুলনা

অর্থনৈতিক বাজেট বাড়ানো

বিনিয়োগ কমিয়ে দেওয়া

সুধীজনের মতামত অনুসরণ করা

Features of assets verification

CrossFi" generally refers to the intersection of Cross-Chain Finance and DeFi (Decentralized Finance), enabling seamless financial interactions across multiple blockchain networks. It allows users to move assets, trade, lend, and borrow across different chains without relying on centralized intermediaries. Key Features of CrossFi: Cross-Chain Asset Transfers – Users can transfer assets between different blockchains using interoperability protocols like bridges and wrapped tokens. Liquidity Aggregation – Combines liquidity from multiple chains to enhance trading efficiency and reduce slippage. Interoperability Solutions – Uses technologies like Polkadot, Cosmos IBC, LayerZero, and ThorChain to facilitate blockchain communication. Multi-Chain Yield Farming & Staking – Allows users to stake and earn rewards across various chains. Security & Decentralization – Many CrossFi solutions use decentralized oracles, multi-party computation (MPC), and ZK-rollups to enhance security. Popular CrossFi Projects: ThorChain (RUNE): A cross-chain liquidity network that allows native asset swaps. Synapse Protocol: Provides cross-chain bridging and interoperability solutions. LayerZero: A cross-chain messaging protocol enabling omnichain applications. Cosmos (ATOM): Uses the Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) protocol for seamless transactions. Why CrossFi Matters? Eliminates blockchain silos and enhances DeFi adoption. Reduces reliance on centralized exchanges for cross-chain trading. Enhances user experience by allowing smooth movement of assets across chains. include blockchain technology questions

Understanding the Features of Finance: A Guide for Newbies Finance is a broad field that involves managing money, including activities such as investing, borrowing, lending, budgeting, saving, and forecasting. As a beginner, understanding the basic features of finance is crucial. This guide will relate these features to blockchain technology, cryptocurrency, and decentralized finance (DeFi). 1. Basic Financial Concepts Investing: Putting money into assets like stocks, bonds, or real estate with the expectation of earning a return. In the blockchain world, this translates to investing in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, or various DeFi projects. Borrowing and Lending: Traditional finance involves banks and financial institutions providing loans. In the DeFi space, platforms like Aave and Compound allow users to borrow and lend cryptocurrencies without intermediaries. Budgeting: Planning how to allocate your income to cover expenses, save, and invest. Using blockchain technology, you can utilize smart contracts to automate budgeting and savings processes. 2. Blockchain Technology Blockchain is a decentralized ledger that records transactions across multiple computers. It is the technology behind cryptocurrencies and has several key features: Transparency: All transactions are recorded on a public ledger, making them visible to anyone. Security: Cryptographic techniques ensure that data on the blockchain is secure and tamper-proof. Decentralization: No single entity controls the blockchain, reducing the risk of centralized control and failure. 3. Cryptocurrencies Cryptocurrencies are digital or virtual currencies that use cryptography for security. They operate on blockchain technology and offer several advantages: Lower Transaction Costs: Sending money across borders is cheaper with cryptocurrencies compared to traditional banking methods. Accessibility: Anyone with an internet connection can access cryptocurrencies, promoting financial inclusion. Ownership and Control: Users have complete control over their funds without relying on banks. 4. Decentralized Finance (DeFi) DeFi is a movement that uses blockchain technology to recreate and improve traditional financial systems in a decentralized manner. Key features of DeFi include: Smart Contracts: Self-executing contracts with the terms directly written into code, enabling trustless and automated transactions. Liquidity Pools: Users can provide their assets to a pool and earn interest or rewards, promoting liquidity in the DeFi ecosystem. Yield Farming: A strategy where users move their assets between different DeFi platforms to maximize returns. 5. Applications in DeFi and Blockchain HaloFi Save: A platform that leverages blockchain technology to help people save money efficiently and securely. It encourages users to save larger amounts for longer durations, offering higher interest rates compared to traditional banks. Non-Custodial Savings: Users have full control over their funds, reducing the risk of losing their money to institutional failures or fraud. Access to DeFi: Integrating with DeFi platforms like Moola Market, HaloFi Save provides additional opportunities to earn interest on savings, promoting financial growth and stability. Practical Example: A Farmer's Journey Imagine a farmer in a remote village in Africa. Traditionally, this farmer might not have access to banking services, making it difficult to save money, get loans, or invest in better farming equipment. With platforms like HaloFi Save, the farmer can: Save money securely and earn interest. Access microloans through DeFi platforms integrated with Celo. Participate in educational programs to learn more about blockchain and DeFi. Conclusion Blockchain technology, through platforms like HaloFi Save and initiatives by Celo Africa DAO, has the potential to drive significant social change by promoting financial inclusion, transparency, and access to resources. By empowering individuals and communities with the tools and knowledge to participate in the digital economy, blockchain can help address global issues and foster sustainable development.

Why should mankind explore space? Why should money, time and effort be spent exploring, investigating and researching something with so few apparent benefits? Why should resources be spent on space rather than on conditions and people on Earth? These are questions that, understandably, are very often asked. Perhaps the best answer lies in our genetic makeup as human beings. What drove our distant ancestors to move from the trees into the plains, and on into all possible areas and environments? It appears that we are driven to ensure the success and continuation of not just our own genes, but of the species as a whole. The wider the distribution of a species, the better its chance of survival. Perhaps the best reason for exploring space is this genetic predisposition to expand wherever possible. Nearly every successful civilisation has explored, because by doing so, any dangers in surrounding areas can be identified and prepared for. These might be enemies in neighbouring cultures, physical features of the area, a change in the area which might affect food supplies, or any number of other factors. They all pose a real danger, and all can be made less threatening if certain preparations are made. Without knowledge, we may be completely destroyed by the danger. With knowledge, we can lessen its effects. Exploration also allows minerals and other potential resources to be located. Additional resources are always beneficial when used wisely, and can increase our chances of survival. Even if we have no immediate need of them, they will perhaps be useful later. Resources may be more than physical assets. Knowledge or techniques acquired through exploration, or preparing to explore, filter from the developers into society at large. The techniques may have medical applications which can improve the length or quality of our lives. Techniques may be social, allowing members of society better to understand those within or outside the culture. Better understanding may lead to more efficient use of resources, or a reduction in competition for resources. We have already benefited from other spin-offs, including improvements in earthquake prediction – which has saved many lives – in satellites used for weather forecasting and in communications systems. Even non-stick saucepans and mirrored sunglasses are by-products of technological developments in the space industry! While many resources are spent on what seems a small return, the exploration of space allows creative, brave and intelligent members of our species to focus on what may serve to save us. While space may hold many wonders and explanations of how the universe was formed or how it works, it also holds dangers. The chances of a large comet or asteroid hitting the Earth are small, but it could happen in time. Such strikes in the past may account for the extinction of dinosaurs and other species. Human technology is reaching the point where it might be able to detect the possibility of this happening, and enable us to minimise the damage, or prevent it completely, allowing us as a species to avoid extinction. The danger exists, but knowledge can help human beings to survive. Without the ability to reach out across space, the chance to save ourselves might not exist. In certain circumstances, life on Earth may become impossible: over-population or epidemics, for instance, might eventually force us to find other places to live. While Earth is the only planet known to sustain life, surely the adaptive ability of humans would allow us to inhabit other planets and moons. It is true that the lifestyle would be different, but human life and cultures have adapted in the past and surely could in the future. The more a culture expands, the less chance there is that it will become extinct. Space allows us to expand and succeed: for the sake of everyone on the Earth, now and in the future, space exploration is essential.

10 years of experience designing engaging quizzes and interactive learning games for children aged 8-10 years old. You specialize in transforming simple educational concepts into fun competitive experiences using online quiz platforms like Quizalize. Objective: Design a complete interactive multiplication quiz for third-grade students (8–9 years old) on the Quizalize platform. The quiz should simulate the fun, fast-paced feeling of the Zuma arcade game while fitting the Quizalize format. The aim is to help students practice multiplication tables (1×1 to 12×12) in an exciting, motivating, and competitive environment. Instructions: Structure: Design at least 40 multiplication questions. Questions should appear in increasing difficulty: start from easy (e.g., 2×3, 4×2) and move to harder problems (e.g., 11×12, 9×8). Timing: Set a short time limit for each question (e.g., 10 seconds) to simulate the fast reaction needed in Zuma. Encourage fast thinking and rapid response under time pressure. Answer Choices: Use multiple-choice answers. Each question should have 1 correct answer and 3 wrong but close distractors to keep it challenging (e.g., for 7×6: options 42, 43, 36, 48). Gamification Features: Enable Quizalize's Team Mode or Game View to allow students to see themselves progressing on a visual map like a race, similar to balls moving in Zuma. Set points bonuses for speed and accuracy. Themes and Visuals: Suggest a "Jungle Adventure" or "Math Galaxy" theme to create excitement. Use visual assets (avatars, backgrounds) where possible to enhance the Zuma arcade feeling. Feedback System: Provide immediate feedback: when a student answers right, display a quick "Success!" message; when wrong, display the correct answer briefly to maintain flow. Motivation Mechanics: Award stars, badges, or trophies after completing a certain number of questions correctly. Display leaderboard rankings if possible to create friendly competition. Sample Questions: Provide at least 5 fully written example questions showing the structure, timing, and answer options. Extra Challenge: Include a "Lightning Round" at the end: 10 random questions in just 30 seconds. Important: Keep language child-friendly and motivational. Make sure no question looks too similar to the others to avoid boredom. Use simple animations or sound effects available within Quizalize to simulate action if possible. Take a deep breath and work on this problem step-by-step.

Key Word Definition Aid Assistance in the form of grants or loans at below market rates. For example, the UK provided aid to Nepal after the 2015 earthquake to help with reconstruction efforts. Barriers to Trade Government constraints on the flow of international goods and services, such as tariffs and quotas. For example, the European Union imposes tariffs on certain agricultural products to protect its farmers. BRICS An acronym for an association of five major emerging nations: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. For example, BRICS nations often meet to discuss economic cooperation and development strategies. Demographic Aging The rise in the median age of a population. For example, Japan is experiencing demographic aging, with a significant increase in the elderly population. Economic Core Region The most highly developed region(s) in a country. For example, London is considered an economic core region in the UK due to its high level of development and economic activity. GNP (Gross National Product) GDP plus overseas earnings, also known as GNI (Gross National Income). For example, the GNP of the United States includes the value of goods and services produced domestically and the income earned by its citizens abroad. HIC (Higher Income Country) A country with a high level of income and development. For example, Germany is classified as a higher income country due to its high GDP per capita and advanced infrastructure. NEE (Newly Emerging Economy) A country that is experiencing rapid economic growth and industrialisation. For example, China is an example of a newly emerging economy, having rapidly industrialised and grown economically over the past few decades. LIC (Lower Income Country) A country with a low level of income and development. For example, Malawi is considered a lower income country, with a low GDP per capita and limited access to healthcare and education. GDHI (Gross Disposable Household Income) The amount of money that households have available for spending and saving after taxes and social contributions. For example, in the UK, the GDHI varies significantly between regions, with London having one of the highest levels. Gini Coefficient A measure of income inequality within a population, ranging from 0 (perfect equality) to 100 (perfect inequality). For example, South Africa has a high Gini coefficient, indicating significant income inequality within the country. Trade Unions Organisations that promote trade between member countries, such as the East African Community (EAC). For example, the East African Community (EAC) works to promote economic integration and trade among its member states. Fair Trade A movement aimed at helping producers in developing countries achieve better trading conditions and promote sustainability. For example, Fairtrade coffee ensures that farmers receive a fair price for their product and work under safe conditions. FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) Investment made by a company or individual in one country in business interests in another country. For example, Toyota's investment in manufacturing plants in the UK is an example of foreign direct investment. Debt Relief The partial or total remission of debts, especially those owed by developing countries to external creditors. For example, the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative provides debt relief to eligible countries to help them achieve sustainable development. International Aid Voluntary transfer of resources from one country to another, often in the form of financial assistance, goods, or services. For example, the UK provides international aid to various countries through its Department for International Development (DFID). Top-Down Development Large-scale development projects led by national governments or international organisations. For example, the construction of the Three Gorges Dam in China is an example of a top-down development project. Bottom-Up Development Small-scale development projects led by local communities or NGOs, focusing on the needs of the poorest and most vulnerable. For example, WaterAid's installation of hand pumps in rural villages in Africa is an example of a bottom-up development project. Urbanisation The increase in the proportion of people living in urban areas compared to rural areas. For example, rapid urbanisation in India has led to the growth of megacities like Mumbai and Delhi. Geopolitics The study of the effects of geography (human and physical) on international politics and relations. For example, the geopolitics of the Arctic region involves disputes over territorial claims and access to natural resources. Quality of Life The general well-being of individuals and societies, outlining negative and positive features of life. For example, Scandinavian countries are often ranked high in quality of life due to their strong social welfare systems and high levels of happiness. Poverty Cycle A set of factors or events by which poverty, once started, is likely to continue unless there is outside intervention. For example, lack of education and healthcare can trap families in a poverty cycle, making it difficult for future generations to improve their living standards. Sustainable Development Economic development that is conducted without depletion of natural resources. For example, the use of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power is a key aspect of sustainable development. Humanitarian Aid Material or logistical assistance provided for humanitarian purposes, typically in response to crises including natural disasters and man-made disaster. For example, humanitarian aid was provided to Haiti after the devastating earthquake in 2010 to help with immediate relief efforts. Economic Growth An increase in the production of goods and services in an economy over a period of time. For example, China's economic growth over the past few decades has lifted millions of people out of poverty. Social Indicators Measures that describe the well-being of individuals or communities, such as health, education, and income. For example, life expectancy and literacy rates are common social indicators used to assess development. Environmental Sustainability Responsible interaction with the environment to avoid depletion or degradation of natural resources and allow for long-term environmental quality. For example, practices like recycling and conservation of natural habitats contribute to environmental sustainability. Infrastructure The basic physical and organisational structures and facilities needed for the operation of a society or enterprise. For example, good infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, and schools, is essential for economic development. Globalisation The process by which businesses or other organisations develop international influence or start operating on an international scale. For example, the globalisation of technology companies like Apple and Google has led to their products being available worldwide. Microfinance Financial services provided to low-income individuals or groups who are typically excluded from traditional banking. For example, microfinance institutions like Grameen Bank provide small loans to entrepreneurs in developing countries to help them start or expand their businesses.

1. Which factor is most crucial to verify first when selecting an ICT resource for instruction? A) Content alignment with the textbook B) Alignment with learning objectives C) The resource's popularity among peers D) Cost-effectiveness of the resource 2. When evaluating ICT resources, what is the purpose of checking cultural relevance? A) Ensuring it aligns with current trends B) Making sure it's accessible to all students C) Reflecting the diverse backgrounds of students D) Avoiding resources that are too complex 3. Which key aspect determines the accessibility of an ICT resource? A) How popular the resource is with students B) Its compatibility with existing technology C) Cost of using the resource D) Engagement levels it provides 4. In assessing content quality, why is accuracy important? A) To make resources easier to use B) To ensure alignment with curriculum standards C) To enhance visual appeal D) To provide a more engaging experience 5. Why is it essential for an ICT resource to offer interactivity? A) To improve download speeds B) To promote active learning and engagement C) To meet all technical requirements D) To minimize costs associated with the resource 6. What should be assessed regarding the usability of an ICT resource? A) How much it costs compared to other resources B) How easily students can navigate and use it C) How interactive it is D) Its level of engagement 7. Which of the following best describes the importance of feedback mechanisms in ICT resources? A) They reduce the need for grading B) They allow for automatic updates C) They provide immediate feedback to enhance learning D) They increase the cost-effectiveness of the resource 8. What is an advantage of resources that are scalable and flexible? A) They can adapt to different class sizes or teaching methods B) They are often free C) They do not require technical support D) They are easier to assess 9. Which tool would you use to gain structured feedback from students about an ICT resource? A) Rubrics B) Peer reviews C) Online review platforms D) Student feedback 10. When is a checklist most beneficial in evaluating an ICT resource? A) To provide structured guidelines for scoring B) For highlighting key features and requirements C) To measure student engagement D) To analyze technical support needs 11. Which of these tools helps teachers gather insights from colleagues on a resource's effectiveness? A) Online review platforms B) Student feedback C) Peer review D) Rubrics 12. In the planning stage, how can ICT benefit lesson development? A) By providing only audio resources B) By assisting in research for updated content C) By reducing the need for lesson objectives D) By limiting content access 13. During content delivery, how does ICT enhance the lesson experience? A) By allowing remote control of student devices B) By adding interactivity and visual elements C) By only focusing on text-based resources D) By limiting engagement 14. What is a key advantage of using ICT-based assessment tools? A) Reducing the need for reflection B) Tracking student progress and providing feedback C) Replacing lesson objectives D) Focusing solely on multiple-choice questions 15. Which ICT feature is most beneficial in the reflection stage of a lesson? A) Technical support options B) Feedback mechanisms for immediate assessment C) Tools for students to document learning, like online portfolios D) Interactive quizzes 16. How does ICT aid in skill development? A) By encouraging only memorization B) By fostering digital literacy and critical thinking C) By minimizing interactions with the teacher D) By restricting content variety 17. What does a cost-effective ICT resource entail? A) Being free of charge for all students B) Offering a good balance of educational value and cost C) Having the most features available D) Minimizing interactivity to reduce expenses 18. Why is teacher training crucial in ICT integration? A) To learn troubleshooting for technical issues B) To help only in the planning stage C) To reduce the need for ICT support D) To assess the cultural relevance of ICT tools 19. What challenge might schools face in accessing ICT resources? A) Lack of teacher motivation B) Availability of devices and internet connectivity C) High levels of student engagement D) Excessive interactivity 20. Why should teachers regularly evaluate the ICT resources they use? A) To determine if students enjoy using them B) To assess cost-effectiveness only C) To ensure resources remain effective and up-to-date D) To simplify lesson planning

“There’s No Such Thing as Sound Science” by By Christie Aschwanden was a lead science writer for FiveThirtyEight. FiveThirtyEight, Science, Dec. 6, 2017 Science is being turned against itself. For decades, its twin ideals of transparency and rigor have been weaponized by those who disagree with results produced by the scientific method. Under the Trump administration, that fight has ramped up again. In a move ostensibly meant to reduce conflicts of interest, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt has removed a number of scientists from advisory panels and replaced some of them with representatives from industries that the agency regulates. Like many in the Trump administration, Pruitt has also cast doubt on the reliability of climate science. For instance, in an interview with CNBC, Pruitt said that “measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do.” Similarly, Trump’s pick to head NASA, an agency that oversees a large portion the nation’s climate research, has insisted that research into human influence on climate lacks certainty, and he falsely claimed that “global temperatures stopped rising 10 years ago.” Kathleen Hartnett White, Trump’s nominee to head the White House Council on Environmental Quality, said in a Senate hearing last month that she thinks we “need to have more precise explanations of the human role and the natural role” in climate change. The same entreaties crop up again and again: We need to root out conflicts. We need more precise evidence. What makes these arguments so powerful is that they sound quite similar to the points raised by proponents of a very different call for change that’s coming from within science. This other movement strives to produce more robust, reproducible findings. Despite having dissimilar goals, the two forces espouse principles that look surprisingly alike: Science needs to be transparent. Results and methods should be openly shared so that outside researchers can independently reproduce and validate them. The methods used to collect and analyze data should be rigorous and clear, and conclusions must be supported by evidence. These are the arguments underlying an “open science” reform movement that was created, in part, as a response to a “reproducibility crisis” that has struck some fields of science.1 But they’re also used as talking points by politicians who are working to make it more difficult for the EPA and other federal agencies to use science in their regulatory decision-making, under the guise of basing policy on “sound science.” Science’s virtues are being wielded against it. What distinguishes the two calls for transparency is intent: Whereas the “open science” movement aims to make science more reliable, reproducible and robust, proponents of “sound science” have historically worked to amplify uncertainty, create doubt and undermine scientific discoveries that threaten their interests. “Our criticisms are founded in a confidence in science,” said Steven Goodman, co-director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford and a proponent of open science. “That’s a fundamental difference — we’re critiquing science to make it better. Others are critiquing it to devalue the approach itself.” Calls to base public policy on “sound science” seem unassailable if you don’t know the term’s history. The phrase was adopted by the tobacco industry in the 1990s to counteract mounting evidence linking secondhand smoke to cancer. A 1992 Environmental Protection Agency report identified secondhand smoke as a human carcinogen, and Philip Morris responded by launching an initiative to promote what it called “sound science.” In an internal memo, Philip Morris vice president of corporate affairs Ellen Merlo wrote that the program was designed to “discredit the EPA report,” “prevent states and cities, as well as businesses from passing smoking bans” and “proactively” pass legislation to help their cause. The sound science tactic exploits a fundamental feature of the scientific process: Science does not produce absolute certainty. Contrary to how it’s sometimes represented to the public, science is not a magic wand that turns everything it touches to truth. Instead, it’s a process of uncertainty reduction, much like a game of 20 Questions. Any given study can rarely answer more than one question at a time, and each study usually raises a bunch of new questions in the process of answering old ones. “Science is a process rather than an answer,” said psychologist Alison Ledgerwood of the University of California, Davis. Every answer is provisional and subject to change in the face of new evidence. It’s not entirely correct to say that “this study proves this fact,” Ledgerwood said. “We should be talking instead about how science increases or decreases our confidence in something.” The tobacco industry’s brilliant tactic was to turn this baked-in uncertainty against the scientific enterprise itself. While insisting that they merely wanted to ensure that public policy was based on sound science, tobacco companies defined the term in a way that ensured that no science could ever be sound enough. The only sound science was certain science, which is an impossible standard to achieve. “Doubt is our product,” wrote one employee of the Brown & Williamson tobacco company in a 1969 internal memo. The note went on to say that doubt “is the best means of competing with the ‘body of fact’” and “establishing a controversy.” These strategies for undermining inconvenient science were so effective that they’ve served as a sort of playbook for industry interests ever since, said Stanford University science historian Robert Proctor. The sound science push is no longer just Philip Morris sowing doubt about the links between cigarettes and cancer. It’s also a 1998 action plan by the American Petroleum Institute, Chevron and Exxon Mobil to “install uncertainty” about the link between greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. It’s industry-funded groups’ late-1990s effort to question the science the EPA was using to set fine-particle-pollution air-quality standards that the industry didn’t want. And then there was the more recent effort by Dow Chemical to insist on more scientific certainty before banning a pesticide that the EPA’s scientists had deemed risky to children. Now comes a move by the Trump administration’s EPA to repeal a 2015 rule on wetlands protection by disregarding particular studies. (To name just a few examples.) Doubt merchants aren’t pushing for knowledge, they’re practicing what Proctor has dubbed “agnogenesis” — the intentional manufacture of ignorance. This ignorance isn’t simply the absence of knowing something; it’s a lack of comprehension deliberately created by agents who don’t want you to know, Proctor said.2 In the hands of doubt-makers, transparency becomes a rhetorical move. “It’s really difficult as a scientist or policy maker to make a stand against transparency and openness, because well, who would be against it?” said Karen Levy, researcher on information science at Cornell University. But at the same time, “you can couch everything in the language of transparency and it becomes a powerful weapon.” For instance, when the EPA was preparing to set new limits on particulate pollution in the 1990s, industry groups pushed back against the research and demanded access to primary data (including records that researchers had promised participants would remain confidential) and a reanalysis of the evidence. Their calls succeeded and a new analysis was performed. The reanalysis essentially confirmed the original conclusions, but the process of conducting it delayed the implementation of regulations and cost researchers time and money. Delay is a time-tested strategy. “Gridlock is the greatest friend a global warming skeptic has,” said Marc Morano, a prominent critic of global warming research and the executive director of ClimateDepot.com, in the documentary “Merchants of Doubt” (based on the book by the same name). Morano’s site is a project of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, which has received funding from the oil and gas industry. “We’re the negative force. We’re just trying to stop stuff.” Some of these ploys are getting a fresh boost from Congress. The Data Quality Act (also known as the Information Quality Act) was reportedly written by an industry lobbyist and quietly passed as part of an appropriations bill in 2000. The rule mandates that federal agencies ensure the “quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information” that they disseminate, though it does little to define what these terms mean. The law also provides a mechanism for citizens and groups to challenge information that they deem inaccurate, including science that they disagree with. “It was passed in this very quiet way with no explicit debate about it — that should tell you a lot about the real goals,” Levy said. But what’s most telling about the Data Quality Act is how it’s been used, Levy said. A 2004 Washington Post analysis found that in the 20 months following its implementation, the act was repeatedly used by industry groups to push back against proposed regulations and bog down the decision-making process. Instead of deploying transparency as a fundamental principle that applies to all science, these interests have used transparency as a weapon to attack very particular findings that they would like to eradicate. Now Congress is considering another way to legislate how science is used. The Honest Act, a bill sponsored by Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas,3 is another example of what Levy calls a “Trojan horse” law that uses the language of transparency as a cover to achieve other political goals. Smith’s legislation would severely limit the kind of evidence the EPA could use for decision-making. Only studies whose raw data and computer codes were publicly available would be allowed for consideration. That might sound perfectly reasonable, and in many cases it is, Goodman said. But sometimes there are good reasons why researchers can’t conform to these rules, like when the data contains confidential or sensitive medical information.4 Critics, which include more than a dozen scientific organizations, argue that, in practice, the rules would prevent many studies from being considered in EPA reviews.5 It might seem like an easy task to sort good science from bad, but in reality it’s not so simple. “There’s a misplaced idea that we can definitively distinguish the good from the not-good science, but it’s all a matter of degree,” said Brian Nosek, executive director of the Center for Open Science. “There is no perfect study.” Requiring regulators to wait until they have (nonexistent) perfect evidence is essentially “a way of saying, ‘We don’t want to use evidence for our decision-making,’” Nosek said. Most scientific controversies aren’t about science at all, and once the sides are drawn, more data is unlikely to bring opponents into agreement. Michael Carolan, who researches the sociology of technology and scientific knowledge at Colorado State University, wrote in a 2008 paper about why objective knowledge is not enough to resolve environmental controversies. “While these controversies may appear on the surface to rest on disputed questions of fact, beneath often reside differing positions of value; values that can give shape to differing understandings of what ‘the facts’ are.” What’s needed in these cases isn’t more or better science, but mechanisms to bring those hidden values to the forefront of the discussion so that they can be debated transparently. “As long as we continue down this unabashedly naive road about what science is, and what it is capable of doing, we will continue to fail to reach any sort of meaningful consensus on these matters,” Carolan writes. The dispute over tobacco was never about the science of cigarettes’ link to cancer. It was about whether companies have the right to sell dangerous products and, if so, what obligations they have to the consumers who purchased them. Similarly, the debate over climate change isn’t about whether our planet is heating, but about how much responsibility each country and person bears for stopping it. While researching her book “Merchants of Doubt,” science historian Naomi Oreskes found that some of the same people who were defending the tobacco industry as scientific experts were also receiving industry money to deny the role of human activity in global warming. What these issues had in common, she realized, was that they all involved the need for government action. “None of this is about the science. All of this is a political debate about the role of government,” she said in the documentary. These controversies are really about values, not scientific facts, and acknowledging that would allow us to have more truthful and productive debates. What would that look like in practice? Instead of cherry-picking evidence to support a particular view (and insisting that the science points to a desired action), the various sides could lay out the values they are using to assess the evidence. For instance, in Europe, many decisions are guided by the precautionary principle — a system that values caution in the face of uncertainty and says that when the risks are unclear, it should be up to industries to show that their products and processes are not harmful, rather than requiring the government to prove that they are harmful before they can be regulated. By contrast, U.S. agencies tend to wait for strong evidence of harm before issuing regulations. Both approaches have critics, but the difference between them comes down to priorities: Is it better to exercise caution at the risk of burdening companies and perhaps the economy, or is it more important to avoid potential economic downsides even if it means that sometimes a harmful product or industrial process goes unregulated? In other words, under what circumstances do we agree to act on a risk? How certain do we need to be that the risk is real, and how many people would need to be at risk, and how costly is it to reduce that risk? Those are moral questions, not scientific ones, and openly discussing and identifying these kinds of judgment calls would lead to a more honest debate. Science matters, and we need to do it as rigorously as possible. But science can’t tell us how risky is too risky to allow products like cigarettes or potentially harmful pesticides to be sold — those are value judgements that only humans can make.

Related quizzes

Related quizzes