intra- | Quizalize

Verbal and non verbal communication, inter and intra personal communication, group communication, Telephonic conversation

Quiz mal, inter, intra

The topic of Life chances, Social problems and inter and intra group conflict topics in sociology

Hello Chuxing, one of China’s top bike-sharing platforms backed by ecommerce giant Alibaba Group Holding, has applied to go public on the Nasdaq stock exchange. Launched in 2016, Hello Chuxing gained traction quickly as the first bikesharing operator to focus its business within China’s smaller cities and towns. It managed to survive China’s bike-sharing bubble between 2017 and 2018 when Ofo went into bankruptcy and Mobike was acquired by Meituan. The “survivor” had more than 10 million bicycles operating in over 400 Chinese cities as of December 2020. Hello Chuxing is developing its new business aggressively. In 2019, it took on sector leader Didi Chuxing with a new business Hello Dache that provides car-sharing and carpooling services. It has also been following industry giant Meituan into the life services field with new “intra-city logistics” and “bulk buying” services. The service, Hello Dache, features instant communication that enables passengers to keep in touch with drivers online once ride requests have been accepted. It also features a one-click button to call the police as part of efforts to boost safety. It is now looking into travel, with the aim of being a travel-based platform that provides daily life services, a person familiar with the matter said. “The market was too lavish when capital players and consumers were optimistic about the sector,” founder Yang Lei said back in 2019. “Firms would burn through cash subsidies to keep up with rivals and maintain a rapid pace of expansion. Hello Chuxing, however, has been careful to watch every penny and use money wisely while planning for the future,” he said.

When it was his turn to speak, Adam Malik, Presidium Minister for Political Affairs and Minister for Foreign Affairs of Indonesia, recalled that about a year before, in Bangkok, at the conclusion of the peace talks between Indonesia and Malaysia, he had explored the idea of an organization such as ASEAN with his Malaysian and Thai counterparts. One of the “angry young men” in his country’s struggle for independence two decades earlier, Adam Malik was then 50 years old and one of a Presidium of five led by then General Soeharto that was steering Indonesia from the verge of economic and political chaos. He was the Presidium’s point man in Indonesia’s efforts to mend fences with its neighbors in the wake of an unfortunate policy of confrontation. During the past year, he said, the Ministers had all worked together toward the realization of the ASEAN idea, “making haste slowly, in order to build a new association for regional cooperation.” Adam Malik went on to describe Indonesia’s vision of a Southeast Asia developing into “a region which can stand on its own feet, strong enough to defend itself against any negative influence from outside the region.” Such a vision, he stressed, was not wishful thinking, if the countries of the region effectively cooperated with each other, considering their combined natural resources and manpower. He referred to differences of outlook among the member countries, but those differences, he said, would be overcome through a maximum of goodwill and understanding, faith and realism. Hard work, patience and perseverance, he added, would also be necessary. The countries of Southeast Asia should also be willing to take responsibility for whatever happens to them, according to Tun Abdul Razak, the Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia, who spoke next. In his speech, he conjured a vision of an ASEAN that would include all the countries of Southeast Asia. Tun Abdul Razak was then concurrently his country’s Minister of Defence and Minister of National Development. It was a time when national survival was the overriding thrust of Malaysia’s relations with other nations and so as Minister of Defence, he was in charge of his country’s foreign affairs. He stressed that the countries of the region should recognize that unless they assumed their common responsibility to shape their own destiny and to prevent external intervention and interference, Southeast Asia would remain fraught with danger and tension. And unless they took decisive and collective action to prevent the eruption of intra-regional conflicts, the nations of Southeast Asia would remain susceptible to manipulation, one against another. “We the nations and peoples of Southeast Asia,” Tun Abdul Razak said, “must get together and form by ourselves a new perspective and a new framework for our region. It is important that individually and jointly we should create a deep awareness that we cannot survive for long as independent but isolated peoples unless we also think and act together and unless we prove by deeds that we belong to a family of Southeast Asian nations bound together by ties of friendship and goodwill and imbued with our own ideals and aspirations and determined to shape our own destiny”. He added that, “with the establishment of ASEAN, we have taken a firm and a bold step on that road”. For his part, S. Rajaratnam, a former Minister of Culture of multi-cultural Singapore who, at that time, served as its first Foreign Minister, noted that two decades of nationalist fervor had not fulfilled the expectations of the people of Southeast Asia for better living standards. If ASEAN would succeed, he said, then its members would have to marry national thinking with regional thinking. “We must now think at two levels,” Rajaratnam said. “We must think not only of our national interests but posit them against regional interests: that is a new way of thinking about our problems. And these are two different things and sometimes they can conflict. Secondly, we must also accept the fact, if we are really serious about it, that regional existence means painful adjustments to those practices and thinking in our respective countries. We must make these painful and difficult adjustments. If we are not going to do that, then regionalism remains a utopia.” S. Rajaratnam expressed the fear, however, that ASEAN would be misunderstood. “We are not against anything”, he said, “not against anybody”. And here he used a term that would have an ominous ring even today: balkanization. In Southeast Asia, as in Europe and any part of the world, he said, outside powers had a vested interest in the balkanization of the region. “We want to ensure,” he said, “a stable Southeast Asia, not a balkanized Southeast Asia. And those countries who are interested, genuinely interested, in the stability of Southeast Asia, the prosperity of Southeast Asia, and better economic and social conditions, will welcome small countries getting together to pool their collective resources and their collective wisdom to contribute to the peace of the world.” The goal of ASEAN, then, is to create, not to destroy. This, the Foreign Minister of Thailand, Thanat Khoman, stressed when it was his turn to speak. At a time when the Vietnam conflict was raging and American forces seemed forever entrenched in Indochina, he had foreseen their eventual withdrawal from the area and had accordingly applied himself to adjusting Thailand’s foreign policy to a reality that would only become apparent more than half a decade later. He must have had that in mind when, on that occasion, he said that the countries of Southeast Asia had no choice but to adjust to the exigencies of the time, to move toward closer cooperation and even integration. Elaborating on ASEAN objectives, he spoke of “building a new society that will be responsive to the needs of our time and efficiently equipped to bring about, for the enjoyment and the material as well as spiritual advancement of our peoples, conditions of stability and progress. Particularly what millions of men and women in our part of the world want is to erase the old and obsolete concept of domination and subjection of the past and replace it with the new spirit of give and take, of equality and partnership. More than anything else, they want to be master of their own house and to enjoy the inherent right to decide their own destiny …” While the nations of Southeast Asia prevent attempts to deprive them of their freedom and sovereignty, he said, they must first free themselves from the material impediments of ignorance, disease and hunger. Each of these nations cannot accomplish that alone, but by joining together and cooperating with those who have the same aspirations, these objectives become easier to attain. Then Thanat Khoman concluded: “What we have decided today is only a small beginning of what we hope will be a long and continuous sequence of accomplishments of which we ourselves, those who will join us later and the generations to come, can be proud. Let it be for Southeast Asia, a potentially rich region, rich in history, in spiritual as well as material resources and indeed for the whole ancient continent of Asia, the light of happiness and well-being that will shine over the uncounted millions of our struggling peoples.” The Foreign Minister of Thailand closed the inaugural session of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations by presenting each of his colleagues with a memento. Inscribed on the memento presented to the Foreign Minister of Indonesia, was the citation, “In recognition of services rendered by His Excellency Adam Malik to the ASEAN organization, the name of which was suggested by him.” And that was how ASEAN was conceived, given a name, and born. It had been barely 14 months since Thanat Khoman brought up the ASEAN idea in his conversations with his Malaysian and Indonesian colleagues. In about three more weeks, Indonesia would fully restore diplomatic relations with Malaysia, and soon after that with Singapore. That was by no means the end to intra-ASEAN disputes, for soon the Philippines and Malaysia would have a falling out on the issue of sovereignty over Sabah. Many disputes between ASEAN countries persist to this day. But all Member Countries are deeply committed to resolving their differences through peaceful means and in the spirit of mutual accommodation. Every dispute would have its proper season but it would not be allowed to get in the way of the task at hand. And at that time, the essential task was to lay the framework of regional dialogue and cooperation. The two-page Bangkok Declaration not only contains the rationale for the establishment of ASEAN and its specific objectives. It represents the organization’s modus operandi of building on small steps, voluntary, and informal arrangements towards more binding and institutionalized agreements. All the founding member states and the newer members have stood fast to the spirit of the Bangkok Declaration. Over the years, ASEAN has progressively entered into several formal and legally-binding instruments, such as the 1976 Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia and the 1995 Treaty on the Southeast Asia Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone. Against the backdrop of conflict in the then Indochina, the Founding Fathers had the foresight of building a community of and for all Southeast Asian states. Thus the Bangkok Declaration promulgated that “the Association is open for participation to all States in the Southeast Asian region subscribing to the aforementioned aims, principles and purposes.” ASEAN’s inclusive outlook has paved the way for community-building not only in Southeast Asia, but also in the broader Asia Pacific region where several other inter-governmental organizations now co-exist. The original ASEAN logo presented five brown sheaves of rice stalks, one for each founding member. Beneath the sheaves is the legend “ASEAN” in blue. These are set on a field of yellow encircled by a blue border. Brown stands for strength and stability, yellow for prosperity and blue for the spirit of cordiality in which ASEAN affairs are conducted. When ASEAN celebrated its 30th Anniversary in 1997, the sheaves on the logo had increased to ten – representing all ten countries of Southeast Asia and reflecting the colors of the flags of all of them. In a very real sense, ASEAN and Southeast Asia would then be one and the same, just as the Founding Fathers had envisioned. This article is based on the first chapter of ASEAN at 30, a publication of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in commemoration of its 30th Anniversary on 8 August 1997, written by Jamil Maidan Flores and Jun Abad.

Cablul cu fibră optică a devenit foarte popular pentru interconectarea echipamentelor de rețea. Aceasta permite transmiterea datelor pe distanțe mari și la lățimi de bandă mai mari față de orice alt mediu de rețea. Fibra optică este flexibilă, da extrem de subțire și transparentă din dioxid de siliciu, nu este mai mare decât un fir de păr uman. Biții sunt codificați pe fibră sub formă de impulsuri de lumină. Cablul cu fibră optică se comportă ca un ghid de unde sau “light pipe”, pentru a transmite lumina între cele două capete cu pierderea minimă a semnalului. Analogic, gandiți-vă la cartonul unei role de hartie, având interiorul căptușit cu o oglindă și lungime de o mie de metri, și un dispozitiv laser care este utilizat pentru a trimite semnale codate, folosind codul Morse, cu viteza luminii. Cam așa funcționează un cablu cu firbă optică, cu excepția faptului că este mai mic în diametru și folosește emiterea sofisticată de lumină și tehnologii de primire. Spre deosebire de firele din cupru, cablul cu fibră optică poate transmite semnale cu mai puțină atenuare și este complet imun la EMI și RFI. Cablarea cu firbă optică este acum utilizată în patru tipuri de industrii: • Rețele ale Companiei:Fibra este utilizată pentru aplicațiile de cablare pentru backbone și interconectarea echipamentelor de infrastructură. • Rețele de Acces și FTTHFiber-to-the-home (FTTH) este utilizat pentru a asigura servicii permanente de broadbant pentru companiile mici și locuințe. FTTH suportă viteze mari de acces la Internet la prețuri accesibile, dar și telemedicină și streaming video. • Rețele Long-HaulProviderii de internet utilizează rețele pe bază de fibră optică terestră pentru a interconecta țări și orașe. De obicei, rețelele cuprind de la o duzină la câteva mii de km și folosesc sisteme de până la 10 Gb/s. • Rețele SubmarineCablurile cu fibră specială sunt utilizate pentru a asigura o viteză crescută fiabilă, soluții de capacitate mare capabile să supraviețuiască în medii dure submarine pe distanțe transoceanice. Scopul nostru este utilizarea fibrei în cadrul companiilor. Proiectarea cablului cu mediu din fibră Deși o fibră optică este foarte subțire, este compusă din două tipuri de geam și dintr-un înveliș de protecție extern. Acestea sunt: • NucleuConstă în geam pur și este partea din fibră prin care trece lumina. • ÎnvelişGeamul care înconjoară nucleul și se comportă ca o oglindă. Impulsurile de lumină se propagă pe nucleu în timp ce învelișur le reflectă. Astfel se păstrează impulsurile de lumină din nucleul fibrei într-un fenomen cunoscut ca reflexie totală internă. • IzolaţieDe obicei, o izolație din PVC protejează nucelul și învelișul. Poate conține și materiale de întărire și un înveliș al cărui scop este să protejeze geamul împotriva umezelii și a zgârieturilor. Deși este sensibil la îndoiri sub unghi ascuțit, proprietățile miezului și ale armăturii au fost modificate la nivel molecular pentru a le face foarte rezistente. Fibra optică este testată printr-un proces de fabricație riguros la o forță de minimum 100,000 livre pe inci pătrat. Fibra optică este suficient de durabilă pentru a rezista în timpul instalării și dezvoltării în condiții de mediu dure din rețelele din întreaga lume. Tipuri de Mediu din Fibră Impulsurile de lumină care reprezintă datele transmise sub formă de biți în mediu sunt generate de: • Lasere • Diode Emițătoare de Lumină (LED-uri) Dispozitivele electronice semiconductoare numite fotodiode detectează pulsurile de lumină și le transformă în tensiuni ce pot fi reconstruite în frame-uri de date. Notă:Lumina laser transmisă în cablarea cu fibră optică poate afecta ochiul uman. Trebuie să evitați să priviți în capătul unei fibre optice active. Cablurile cu fibră optică pot fi clasificate în două tipuri: • Fibră single-mode (SMF)Constă într-un nucleu foarte mic și folosește tehnologie laser scumpă pentru a trimite o singură rază de lumină. Este utilizată de obicei pe distanțe lungi care se întind pe sute de km precum telefonie pe distanțe mari și aplicații TV prin cablu. • Fibră multimode (MMF)Constă într-un nucleu mare și folosește emițătoare LED pentru a trimite impulsuri de lumină. Lumina dintr-un LED intră în fibra multimode în unghiuri diferite. Este utilizată în LAN-uri deoarece pot fi pornire prin LED-uri ieftine. Asigură lățime de bandă până la 10 Gb/s pe distanțe de până la 550 metri. Figura 1 și 2 evidențiază caracteristicile celor două tipuri de fibră. Una dintre diferențe este cantitatea de dispersie. Dispersia se referă la împrăștierea unui impuls de lumină pe o durată de timp. Cu cât este mai mare dispersia, cu atât este mai mare pierderea de putere a semnalului.

Related quizzes

Related quizzes