1. What do you call the study that is concerned with a particular objective of investigation?

2. What kind of Filipino philosophy wherein Filipino believes in ‘gulong ng palad’ (wheel of fortune) and looks at life as a series of up and downs and makes the Filipino an unmitigated optimist?

3. What kind of principle states that nothing exists without sufficient reason for its being and existence?

4. Whatever is; whatever is not is not; everything is what it is. Everything is its own being, and not being is not being. What principle is this?

5. What kind of philosophy investigates things not by using any other laboratory instrument or investigative tools, neither on the basis of supernatural revelation?

6. What kind of principle declares that “a thing is either is or is not; everything must be either be or not be; between being and not-being, there is no middle ground possible”?

7. What kind of principle states that it is impossible for a thing to be and not to be at the same time, and at the same respect?

8. What kind of study follows certain steps or employs certain procedures?

9. What kind of principle states that from which something proceeds in any manner?

10. What branch of science states that by natural light of reason study the first cause or highest principles of all things?

11. It is an extension of a fundamental and necessary drive in every human being to know what is real.

12. What would happen if Metaphysics, one of the branches of philosophy, is omitted?

13. What do you think is the focus of study of Epistemology?

14. What is the meaning of logic in philosophy?

15. Where did the Bahala Na attitude of the Filipino come from?

16.  What is a defect in an argument other than its having false premises?

17. What is a specific kind of appeal to emotion in which someone tries to win support for an argument or idea by exploiting his or her opponent’s feelings of guilt?

18. What states that whatever has not been proved false must be true, and vice versa?

19. What fallacy infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that is true of some part of the whole?

20. What fallacy is a logical chain of reasoning of a term or a word several times, but giving the particular word a different meaning each time?

21. What kind of fallacy that reason’s logically that something true of a thing must also be true of all or some of its parts?

22. In what way is critical thinking a tool for reasoning?

23. It is a specific kind of appeal to emotion in which someone tries to win support for an argument or idea by exploiting his/her opponents feeling of pity and guilt. What kind of appeal is this?

24. What type of basic reasoning that draws conclusion from usually one broad judgment or definition and one more specific assertion?

25. What do you call that phenomenologist “brackets” which questions truth or reality and simply describes the contents of consciousness?

26. What do you call the defect in an argument other than its having a false premise?

27. What ideas justify the Fact or Truth?

28. What do you think is the meaning of Intelligence in philosophy?

29. Why do you think that Truth is perceived through 5 senses, namely, seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling & touching & using 6th sense intelligence?

30. What details would you use to support the view of Knowledge?