Introduction to English Common Law: Week 4 Statutes
Quiz by Liliana Colodeeva
Feel free to use or edit a copy
includes Teacher and Student dashboards
Measure skillsfrom any curriculum
Measure skills
from any curriculum
Tag the questions with any skills you have. Your dashboard will track each student's mastery of each skill.
With a free account, teachers can
- edit the questions
- save a copy for later
- start a class game
- view complete results in the Gradebook and Mastery Dashboards
- automatically assign follow-up activities based on students’ scores
- assign as homework
- share a link with colleagues
- print as a bubble sheet
Our brand new solo games combine with your quiz, on the same screen
Correct quiz answers unlock more play!
10 questions
Show answers
- Q1Which one of these is NOT a source of English law?StatutesCommon lawEuropean Union lawParliamentary bills30s
- Q2Which of these is NOT part of the process a Bill must go through to become law?ReferendumRoyal AssentHouse of CommonsHouse of Lords45s
- Q3Acts of Parliament are also calledSecondary LegislationPrimary LegislationDelegated Legislation30s
- Q4Which of these is the correct definition of the ‘golden rule’ of statutory interpretation?Giving the words their ordinary meaning unless this produces an absurdityTaking the plain, literal meaning of the words of the legislationConsidering the purpose behind the legislationConsidering what the ‘mischief’ was that parliament intended to correct60s
- Q5Delegated Legislation is also calledStatuteSecondary LegislationPrimary Legislation30s
- Q6In 'Pepper v Hart', the House of Lords limited the circumstances in which reference could be made to Hansard for the purposes of statutory interpretation. Which of these is NOT one of the limiting conditions?The legislation is ambiguous or obscure.The statements relied on are clear.The statement has been made in Hansard within the last 12 months.The material relied on is a statement of a Minister.60s
- Q7Statutes or Acts of Parliament can be classed as primary legislation.TrueFalse30s
- Q8Which of these best describes the approach of the courts in interpreting legislation under section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998?They must interpret all legislation in accordance with the European Convention on Human Rights ‘so far as is possible’ and can make a declaration of incompatibility if they cannot do so.They must interpret legislation in accordance with the European Convention on Human Rights, and must declare the law to be invalid if they cannot do so.They have a choice whether to interpret legislation in accordance with the European Convention on Human Rights if it is ‘in the interests of justice’ to do so.120s
- Q9Which of these best describes the powers of the courts under section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998?The court can make a declaration of incompatibilityThe court has no real powers under section 4The court can rule that the legislation is invalidThe court can state that the legislation must be redrafted 'so far as is possible'60s
- Q10The traditional approach taken by the courts, the interpretation statutes, is NOT based on the idea that the court's role is to identify the intention of parliament.TrueFalse30s