placeholder image to represent content

​Progress and Challenges in Brain Implants- Reading Proficiency

Quiz by Mia Cristialen P. Boqueda

Our brand new solo games combine with your quiz, on the same screen

Correct quiz answers unlock more play!

New Quizalize solo game modes
10 questions
Show answers
  • Q1

    Progress and Challenges in Brain Implants

    In a paper recently published in the leading journal The Lancet Digital Health, a scientific team led by Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna looks at the progress and challenges in the research and development of brain implants. New achievements in the field of this technology are seen as a source of hope for many patients with neurological disorders and have been making headlines recently. As neural implants have an effect not only on a physical but also on a psychological level, researchers are calling for particular ethical and scientific care when conducting clinical trials.

    The research and development of neuroprostheses has entered a phase in which experiments on animal models are being followed by tests on humans.

    Only recently, reports of a paraplegic patient in the USA who was implanted with a brain chip as part of a clinical trial caused a stir.

    With the help of the implant, the man can control his wheelchair, operate the keyboard on his computer and use the cursor in such a way that he can even play chess.

    About a month after the implantation, however, the patient realized that the precision of the cursor control was decreasing and the time between his thoughts and the computer actions was delayed.

    "The problem could be partially, but not completely, resolved -- and illustrates just one of the potential challenges for research into this technology," explains study author Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna's Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, who published the paper together with Marcello Ienca (Technical University of Munich) and Giacomo Valle (ETH Zurich). "The questions of who will take care of the technical maintenance after the end of the study and whether the device will still be available to the patient at all after the study has been cancelled or completed are among the many aspects that need to be clarified in advance in neuroprosthesis research and development, which is predominantly industry-led."

    (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/01/250124151126.htm)

    What challenge did the paraplegic patient face after receiving the brain chip implant?

    Reduced precision in cursor control and delayed computer actions

    Complete malfunction of the wheelchair control system

    Difficulty in understanding how to use the device properly

    Inability to play chess using the computer interface

    120s
  • Q2

    Progress and Challenges in Brain Implants

    In a paper recently published in the leading journal The Lancet Digital Health, a scientific team led by Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna looks at the progress and challenges in the research and development of brain implants. New achievements in the field of this technology are seen as a source of hope for many patients with neurological disorders and have been making headlines recently. As neural implants have an effect not only on a physical but also on a psychological level, researchers are calling for particular ethical and scientific care when conducting clinical trials.

    The research and development of neuroprostheses has entered a phase in which experiments on animal models are being followed by tests on humans.

    Only recently, reports of a paraplegic patient in the USA who was implanted with a brain chip as part of a clinical trial caused a stir.

    With the help of the implant, the man can control his wheelchair, operate the keyboard on his computer and use the cursor in such a way that he can even play chess.

    About a month after the implantation, however, the patient realized that the precision of the cursor control was decreasing and the time between his thoughts and the computer actions was delayed.

    "The problem could be partially, but not completely, resolved -- and illustrates just one of the potential challenges for research into this technology," explains study author Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna's Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, who published the paper together with Marcello Ienca (Technical University of Munich) and Giacomo Valle (ETH Zurich). "The questions of who will take care of the technical maintenance after the end of the study and whether the device will still be available to the patient at all after the study has been cancelled or completed are among the many aspects that need to be clarified in advance in neuroprosthesis research and development, which is predominantly industry-led."

    (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/01/250124151126.htm)

    According to the text, what is a major concern for patients using neuroprosthesis devices?

    Experiencing side effects from using neuroprosthesis technology

    Learning how to operate the devices without medical assistance

    Access to technical maintenance after the study is completed

    Finding the most affordable neuroprosthesis options on the market

    120s
  • Q3

    Progress and Challenges in Brain Implants

    In a paper recently published in the leading journal The Lancet Digital Health, a scientific team led by Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna looks at the progress and challenges in the research and development of brain implants. New achievements in the field of this technology are seen as a source of hope for many patients with neurological disorders and have been making headlines recently. As neural implants have an effect not only on a physical but also on a psychological level, researchers are calling for particular ethical and scientific care when conducting clinical trials.

    The research and development of neuroprostheses has entered a phase in which experiments on animal models are being followed by tests on humans.

    Only recently, reports of a paraplegic patient in the USA who was implanted with a brain chip as part of a clinical trial caused a stir.

    With the help of the implant, the man can control his wheelchair, operate the keyboard on his computer and use the cursor in such a way that he can even play chess.

    About a month after the implantation, however, the patient realized that the precision of the cursor control was decreasing and the time between his thoughts and the computer actions was delayed.

    "The problem could be partially, but not completely, resolved -- and illustrates just one of the potential challenges for research into this technology," explains study author Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna's Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, who published the paper together with Marcello Ienca (Technical University of Munich) and Giacomo Valle (ETH Zurich). "The questions of who will take care of the technical maintenance after the end of the study and whether the device will still be available to the patient at all after the study has been cancelled or completed are among the many aspects that need to be clarified in advance in neuroprosthesis research and development, which is predominantly industry-led."

    (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/01/250124151126.htm)

    Who is most likely to benefit from reading this text?

    Researchers and developers involved in neuroprosthesis studies

    Patients seeking information on how to purchase neuroprostheses

     Marketing professionals promoting medical technology products

    Engineers looking to design more affordable neuroprosthesis devices

    120s
  • Q4

    Progress and Challenges in Brain Implants

    In a paper recently published in the leading journal The Lancet Digital Health, a scientific team led by Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna looks at the progress and challenges in the research and development of brain implants. New achievements in the field of this technology are seen as a source of hope for many patients with neurological disorders and have been making headlines recently. As neural implants have an effect not only on a physical but also on a psychological level, researchers are calling for particular ethical and scientific care when conducting clinical trials.

    The research and development of neuroprostheses has entered a phase in which experiments on animal models are being followed by tests on humans.

    Only recently, reports of a paraplegic patient in the USA who was implanted with a brain chip as part of a clinical trial caused a stir.

    With the help of the implant, the man can control his wheelchair, operate the keyboard on his computer and use the cursor in such a way that he can even play chess.

    About a month after the implantation, however, the patient realized that the precision of the cursor control was decreasing and the time between his thoughts and the computer actions was delayed.

    "The problem could be partially, but not completely, resolved -- and illustrates just one of the potential challenges for research into this technology," explains study author Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna's Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, who published the paper together with Marcello Ienca (Technical University of Munich) and Giacomo Valle (ETH Zurich). "The questions of who will take care of the technical maintenance after the end of the study and whether the device will still be available to the patient at all after the study has been cancelled or completed are among the many aspects that need to be clarified in advance in neuroprosthesis research and development, which is predominantly industry-led."

    (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/01/250124151126.htm)

    Which piece of evidence supports the challenge of neuroprosthesis research?

    Industry-led research always guarantees device availability.

    Neuroprostheses require no upkeep once they are implanted.

    All patients are satisfied with neuroprosthesis technology.

    Technical maintenance questions remain unresolved.

    120s
  • Q5

    Progress and Challenges in Brain Implants

    In a paper recently published in the leading journal The Lancet Digital Health, a scientific team led by Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna looks at the progress and challenges in the research and development of brain implants. New achievements in the field of this technology are seen as a source of hope for many patients with neurological disorders and have been making headlines recently. As neural implants have an effect not only on a physical but also on a psychological level, researchers are calling for particular ethical and scientific care when conducting clinical trials.

    The research and development of neuroprostheses has entered a phase in which experiments on animal models are being followed by tests on humans.

    Only recently, reports of a paraplegic patient in the USA who was implanted with a brain chip as part of a clinical trial caused a stir.

    With the help of the implant, the man can control his wheelchair, operate the keyboard on his computer and use the cursor in such a way that he can even play chess.

    About a month after the implantation, however, the patient realized that the precision of the cursor control was decreasing and the time between his thoughts and the computer actions was delayed.

    "The problem could be partially, but not completely, resolved -- and illustrates just one of the potential challenges for research into this technology," explains study author Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna's Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, who published the paper together with Marcello Ienca (Technical University of Munich) and Giacomo Valle (ETH Zurich). "The questions of who will take care of the technical maintenance after the end of the study and whether the device will still be available to the patient at all after the study has been cancelled or completed are among the many aspects that need to be clarified in advance in neuroprosthesis research and development, which is predominantly industry-led."

    (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/01/250124151126.htm)

    Which statement effectively links the argument about challenges in neuroprosthesis research with scientific evidence?

    Patients are responsible for all technical issues after the study ends.

    Challenges arise as industry-led research often overlooks

    maintenance.

    Technical maintenance is not an issue because devices last forever.

    Neuroprostheses are popular, so maintenance is not a concern.

    120s
  • Q6

    Progress and Challenges in Brain Implants

    In a paper recently published in the leading journal The Lancet Digital Health, a scientific team led by Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna looks at the progress and challenges in the research and development of brain implants. New achievements in the field of this technology are seen as a source of hope for many patients with neurological disorders and have been making headlines recently. As neural implants have an effect not only on a physical but also on a psychological level, researchers are calling for particular ethical and scientific care when conducting clinical trials.

    The research and development of neuroprostheses has entered a phase in which experiments on animal models are being followed by tests on humans.

    Only recently, reports of a paraplegic patient in the USA who was implanted with a brain chip as part of a clinical trial caused a stir.

    With the help of the implant, the man can control his wheelchair, operate the keyboard on his computer and use the cursor in such a way that he can even play chess.

    About a month after the implantation, however, the patient realized that the precision of the cursor control was decreasing and the time between his thoughts and the computer actions was delayed.

    "The problem could be partially, but not completely, resolved -- and illustrates just one of the potential challenges for research into this technology," explains study author Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna's Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, who published the paper together with Marcello Ienca (Technical University of Munich) and Giacomo Valle (ETH Zurich). "The questions of who will take care of the technical maintenance after the end of the study and whether the device will still be available to the patient at all after the study has been cancelled or completed are among the many aspects that need to be clarified in advance in neuroprosthesis research and development, which is predominantly industry-led."

    (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/01/250124151126.htm)

    Which of the following is relevant information when evaluating challenges in neuroprosthesis research?

    The color and design of neuroprosthesis devices

    The number of studies conducted on unrelated medical devices

    The technical maintenance required after studies end

    The popularity of neuroprostheses in social media discussions

    120s
  • Q7

    Progress and Challenges in Brain Implants

    In a paper recently published in the leading journal The Lancet Digital Health, a scientific team led by Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna looks at the progress and challenges in the research and development of brain implants. New achievements in the field of this technology are seen as a source of hope for many patients with neurological disorders and have been making headlines recently. As neural implants have an effect not only on a physical but also on a psychological level, researchers are calling for particular ethical and scientific care when conducting clinical trials.

    The research and development of neuroprostheses has entered a phase in which experiments on animal models are being followed by tests on humans.

    Only recently, reports of a paraplegic patient in the USA who was implanted with a brain chip as part of a clinical trial caused a stir.

    With the help of the implant, the man can control his wheelchair, operate the keyboard on his computer and use the cursor in such a way that he can even play chess.

    About a month after the implantation, however, the patient realized that the precision of the cursor control was decreasing and the time between his thoughts and the computer actions was delayed.

    "The problem could be partially, but not completely, resolved -- and illustrates just one of the potential challenges for research into this technology," explains study author Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna's Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, who published the paper together with Marcello Ienca (Technical University of Munich) and Giacomo Valle (ETH Zurich). "The questions of who will take care of the technical maintenance after the end of the study and whether the device will still be available to the patient at all after the study has been cancelled or completed are among the many aspects that need to be clarified in advance in neuroprosthesis research and development, which is predominantly industry-led."

    (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/01/250124151126.htm)

    The statement "The problem could be partially, but not completely, resolved" suggests that:

    Researchers are not interested in solving technical maintenance problems.

    All issues with neuroprostheses have already been fully addressed.

    The challenges in neuroprosthesis research are complex and ongoing.

    Neuroprosthesis devices never face any technical difficulties.

    120s
  • Q8

    Progress and Challenges in Brain Implants

    In a paper recently published in the leading journal The Lancet Digital Health, a scientific team led by Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna looks at the progress and challenges in the research and development of brain implants. New achievements in the field of this technology are seen as a source of hope for many patients with neurological disorders and have been making headlines recently. As neural implants have an effect not only on a physical but also on a psychological level, researchers are calling for particular ethical and scientific care when conducting clinical trials.

    The research and development of neuroprostheses has entered a phase in which experiments on animal models are being followed by tests on humans.

    Only recently, reports of a paraplegic patient in the USA who was implanted with a brain chip as part of a clinical trial caused a stir.

    With the help of the implant, the man can control his wheelchair, operate the keyboard on his computer and use the cursor in such a way that he can even play chess.

    About a month after the implantation, however, the patient realized that the precision of the cursor control was decreasing and the time between his thoughts and the computer actions was delayed.

    "The problem could be partially, but not completely, resolved -- and illustrates just one of the potential challenges for research into this technology," explains study author Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna's Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, who published the paper together with Marcello Ienca (Technical University of Munich) and Giacomo Valle (ETH Zurich). "The questions of who will take care of the technical maintenance after the end of the study and whether the device will still be available to the patient at all after the study has been cancelled or completed are among the many aspects that need to be clarified in advance in neuroprosthesis research and development, which is predominantly industry-led."

    (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/01/250124151126.htm)

    Why is the availability of neuroprosthesis devices after study completion a concern according to the text?

    It highlights the need for sustainable solutions in medical research.

    It reflects the ongoing ethical debate about experimental technologies.

    It shows that patients do not benefit from neuroprostheses.

    It suggests that researchers are unwilling to support long-term care.

    120s
  • Q9

    Progress and Challenges in Brain Implants

    In a paper recently published in the leading journal The Lancet Digital Health, a scientific team led by Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna looks at the progress and challenges in the research and development of brain implants. New achievements in the field of this technology are seen as a source of hope for many patients with neurological disorders and have been making headlines recently. As neural implants have an effect not only on a physical but also on a psychological level, researchers are calling for particular ethical and scientific care when conducting clinical trials.

    The research and development of neuroprostheses has entered a phase in which experiments on animal models are being followed by tests on humans.

    Only recently, reports of a paraplegic patient in the USA who was implanted with a brain chip as part of a clinical trial caused a stir.

    With the help of the implant, the man can control his wheelchair, operate the keyboard on his computer and use the cursor in such a way that he can even play chess.

    About a month after the implantation, however, the patient realized that the precision of the cursor control was decreasing and the time between his thoughts and the computer actions was delayed.

    "The problem could be partially, but not completely, resolved -- and illustrates just one of the potential challenges for research into this technology," explains study author Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna's Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, who published the paper together with Marcello Ienca (Technical University of Munich) and Giacomo Valle (ETH Zurich). "The questions of who will take care of the technical maintenance after the end of the study and whether the device will still be available to the patient at all after the study has been cancelled or completed are among the many aspects that need to be clarified in advance in neuroprosthesis research and development, which is predominantly industry-led."

    (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/01/250124151126.htm)

    Which of the following questions cannot be answered by the information provided in the text?

    What are the ethical considerations of neuroprosthesisdevelopment?

    What challenges are faced in neuroprosthesis research and development?

    How does neuroprosthesis technology impact patients' daily lives?

    Who is responsible for maintaining neuroprosthesis devices after studies?

    120s
  • Q10

    Progress and Challenges in Brain Implants

    In a paper recently published in the leading journal The Lancet Digital Health, a scientific team led by Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna looks at the progress and challenges in the research and development of brain implants. New achievements in the field of this technology are seen as a source of hope for many patients with neurological disorders and have been making headlines recently. As neural implants have an effect not only on a physical but also on a psychological level, researchers are calling for particular ethical and scientific care when conducting clinical trials.

    The research and development of neuroprostheses has entered a phase in which experiments on animal models are being followed by tests on humans.

    Only recently, reports of a paraplegic patient in the USA who was implanted with a brain chip as part of a clinical trial caused a stir.

    With the help of the implant, the man can control his wheelchair, operate the keyboard on his computer and use the cursor in such a way that he can even play chess.

    About a month after the implantation, however, the patient realized that the precision of the cursor control was decreasing and the time between his thoughts and the computer actions was delayed.

    "The problem could be partially, but not completely, resolved -- and illustrates just one of the potential challenges for research into this technology," explains study author Stanisa Raspopovic from MedUni Vienna's Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, who published the paper together with Marcello Ienca (Technical University of Munich) and Giacomo Valle (ETH Zurich). "The questions of who will take care of the technical maintenance after the end of the study and whether the device will still be available to the patient at all after the study has been cancelled or completed are among the many aspects that need to be clarified in advance in neuroprosthesis research and development, which is predominantly industry-led."

    (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/01/250124151126.htm)

    Which conclusion is best supported by the information in the text?

    Technical maintenance is irrelevant to neuroprosthesis effectiveness

    All neuroprosthesis issues have been fully resolved by researchers.

    Neuroprosthesis devices are always available after studies end.

    Neuroprosthesis research faces challenges in planning maintenance.

    120s

Teachers give this quiz to your class