Project 3 K | Quizalize

THE STRATEGIC PLAN OF RICHARD BLAND COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY 2020-2025 “The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew and act anew.” – Abraham Lincoln What is the role of a selective, two-year, residential, liberal arts transfer institution within the higher education landscape of the Commonwealth of Virginia? This is a key question that must be answered to ensure the success of Richard Bland College (RBC) and the constituency that the College serves. The 2020 RBC strategic plan’s primary objective is to answer that very question so that the College, the community and the Commonwealth can engage successfully within this identity and purpose to the benefit of all. RBC has long been identified as the hidden gem of higher education in Virginia. The hidden adjective is based both on its relative obscurity—few are aware of RBC outside the Tri-Cities region—and its rural setting featuring 750+ acres of wetlands, bucolic forest, and the state’s oldest and largest pecan grove. Additionally, on average, a student of Richard Bland College travels a mere 36 miles to campus. This keeps the knowledge of RBC in a tightly focused radius. The gem moniker refers both to the College’s reputation for excellence and the undeniable sensation that the campus often elicits in its students, visitors, faculty and staff, the feeling of a warm and palpable embrace of care, compassion and support. That sensation is where we start. According the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV), 99% of the 11.5 million new jobs created since the great recession require workers to have more than a high-school education. Students with a bachelor’s degree have an earning potential almost double that of people with only a high school education, and yet only 17% of residents in the Petersburg area have a bachelor’s degree, 15% below the national average. The obstacles in the way of education have been exhaustively researched and include financial challenges, academic under-preparedness, low self-esteem, slow college assimilation and immature levels of self-efficacy. To combat this growing problem, Richard Bland College initiated a pilot program to determine the viability of a data-driven approach to improve retention and graduation rates. The program ultimately effected a cultural, organizational and operational shift at RBC, resulting in a personalized model of student support, the Exceptional Student Experience (ESE@RBC). Originally many of the practices that RBC used as the basis of ESE@RBC were adapted from the four key principles found in the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC) Pathways Project: 1) map pathways to student end goals; 2) help students choose and enter a program pathway; 3) keep students on path; and 4) ensure that students are learning. Unfortunately, limited resources made it necessary to skip some primary elements of guided pathways and instead to focus on a specific, high-priority project that was immediately available for implementation, dedicated student support. This strategic framework reimagines the way that RBC serves students, faculty and staff within the context of our existing culture, the principles of guided pathways and a hybrid work-college experience. Rather than thinking of a two-year college as a pipeline to a four-year university, this vision describes a more expansive menu of well-defined pathways to high-demand fields, all radiating from a curriculum constructed around the development of soft skills that define the liberal arts experience: critical thinking, written communication, analytical reasoning, civic engagement and oral communication. Furthermore, the impact of meaningful work is a resonating theme, providing avenues to participate in career-focused internships and jobs that develop important life & work skills, confidence, and character. Richard Bland has tested its entrepreneurial mettle and its capacity for transformation in recent years. The College was among a select few Competency-Based Education sites established by the U.S. Department of Education. We were ahead of the curve using predictive analytics to improve student retention and success rates, and online enrollment now makes up nearly 20 percent of course offerings. It may be counter-intuitive, but these and other deep-level institutional changes still to come will ensure that Richard Bland College remains true to its original mission. We prepare our students for a lifetime of endless potential.

Unit 2 - lesson 3 (project)

B2 - Dictation Friday 19/3 (project - advise)

Question 1: Role Allocation a. How did your team decide on the roles and responsibilities for each team member? 1. By drawing lots 2. By assigning roles based on personal preferences 3. By discussing and considering each member's skills and interests 4. By letting the team leader decide Question 2: Role Allocation b. Did everyone in the team contribute to defining their roles and responsibilities? 1. Yes, everyone had a say in defining their roles 2. No, only the team leader decided the roles 3. Only a few members contributed to defining roles 4. Roles were assigned by the instructor Question 3: Role Allocation c. How does each team member's role contribute to the overall project? 1. Each member's role is unrelated to the project 2. Each member's role is equally important for the project's success 3. Some roles are more important than others 4. The team did not define specific roles for each member Question 4: Communication a. Describe the communication tools and strategies your team used to collaborate effectively. 1. We only communicated through email 2. We used a combination of email, messaging apps, and face-to-face meetings 3. We relied solely on face-to-face meetings 4. We did not have any specific communication tools or strategies Question 5: Communication b. How did your team handle disagreements or conflicts in communication? 1. We avoided conflicts by not discussing disagreements 2. We had open discussions and found compromises 3. Conflicts were resolved by the team leader's decision 4. We did not encounter any conflicts in communication Question 6: Communication c. Did you have regular team meetings, and how did they contribute to your project's progress? 1. We had regular meetings, but they did not contribute to the project's progress 2. We had irregular meetings, which hindered the project's progress 3. We had regular meetings, and they significantly contributed to the project's progress 4. We did not have any team meetings Question 7: Problem Solving a. Can you provide an example of a challenging problem your team encountered during the project, and how did you work together to solve it? 1. We did not encounter any challenging problems 2. We encountered a problem, but did not work together to solve it 3. We encountered a problem and worked together to find a solution 4. We encountered a problem, but only the team leader solved it Question 8: Problem Solving b. Did your team encounter any technical roadblocks, and how did you collectively address them? 1. We did not encounter any technical roadblocks 2. We encountered roadblocks, but did not address them collectively 3. We encountered roadblocks and collectively found solutions 4. Only a few team members addressed the technical roadblocks Question 9: Problem Solving c. Were there any innovative solutions or ideas that emerged through team collaboration? 1. No, there were no innovative solutions or ideas 2. Yes, there were some innovative solutions or ideas 3. Only the team leader came up with innovative solutions or ideas 4. The team did not collaborate on finding solutions or ideas Question 10: Project Planning and Organization a. How did your team plan and manage tasks and deadlines throughout the project? 1. We did not have a plan or manage tasks and deadlines 2. We had a plan, but did not manage tasks and deadlines effectively 3. We had a plan and managed tasks and deadlines effectively 4. Only the team leader managed tasks and deadlines Answer Key: 1. c 2. a 3. b 4. b 5. b 6. c 7. c 8. c 9. b 10. c

3/28/23 SS PROJECT QUIZ SO YOU CAN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT

Inspire Manak Mathematics Project: Teacher: sarasa srinivasa kumar Student: Brundageethika, class 10 AP MODEL SCHOOL, Nandavaram, Marripadu Mandal, Nellore District *Title:* Enhanced Irrigation System for Efficient Water Use in Agriculture *Overview:* This project aims to develop an optimized irrigation system using mathematical principles to efficiently distribute water throughout a farm. By employing geometry, linear programming, and ratios, the system enables farmers to optimize water allocation, enhance crop yield, and reduce water consumption. *Issue Addressed:* Inefficient irrigation methods lead to excessive water consumption and reduced crop productivity. Conventional methods often result in inconsistent water distribution, wasting this precious resource. *Benefits:* - Guarantees efficient water usage, minimizing waste and preserving resources - Potential to reduce water consumption by up to 30% - Enhances crop productivity by ensuring each plant receives the ideal amount of water - Easy to implement and cost-effective for farmers in water-scarce areas - Promotes environmentally responsible agricultural practices - Scalable for various farm sizes and crop types *Required Tools:* 1. *Mathematical Tools:* - Graph paper or software (e.g., GeoGebra) - Calculator or software (e.g., Excel) for linear programming - Ruler and compass for manual layout design 2. *Materials for the Model:* - Cardboard or plywood board for farm layout model - Small containers (e.g., cups, bottles) for simulating water distribution - Plastic tubing or straws for irrigation channels - Clay or soil for crop fields 3. *Water Distribution System:* - Water pump or manual syringe for demonstrating water flow - Small-scale water reservoir (bowl or tank) - Valves or small taps to control water flow 4. *Visualization and Display:* - Markers, pens, and labels for marking crop sections and water flow paths - Charts or posters for showing mathematical calculations and results - Projector or laptop (optional) for digital models 5. *Miscellaneous:* - Adhesive (glue, tape) for assembling the model - Scissors or cutting tools for shaping materials - Measuring tape for accurate model scaling This project has the potential to make a significant impact on agricultural practices, and I'm excited to see how it develops!

Related quizzes

Related quizzes