
SECOND PARTIAL EXAM ENGLISH ADVANCED 6
Quiz by CLAUDIA ALEJANDRA RUIZ SANDOVAL
Feel free to use or edit a copy
includes Teacher and Student dashboards
Measure skillsfrom any curriculum
Measure skills
from any curriculum
Tag the questions with any skills you have. Your dashboard will track each student's mastery of each skill.
With a free account, teachers can
- edit the questions
- save a copy for later
- start a class game
- automatically assign follow-up activities based on students’ scores
- assign as homework
- share a link with colleagues
- print as a bubble sheet
40 questions
Show answers
- Q1READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS Flooding: the new danger Areas in certain parts of the world have recently been hit by disastrous floods and others by a sequence of earthquakes. (Most of us know someone who has been caught up in the devastation caused by these events. Away from earthquake zones, one worrying problem these days is flooding and it is predicted that as a result of the changes in climate, this type of disaster will occur with greater frequency in the future, affecting millions of people. Indeed, if anything, the situation is likely to get worse. Many experts believe that those responsible will need to look at a range of measures, not just flood defences, but also land management schemes and even how we design our homes so that floods do less damage to property when they do occur and houses can be lived in again soon after the waters recede. It seems that our approach to flooding needs a complete rethink. There are many victims of flooding. Firstly, there are those (one in five people in Britain) who live in constant fear of heavy rainfall. Every time it rains for longer than a day or two, they ask, ‘Will it be us this time? Will it be our house that is flooded?’ After the fear, comes the reality; tons of water spilling over the river banks, into roads, houses and over fields. People become trapped in their own homes when the road becomes a river and need to be rescued by ill-prepared rescue services. And people die in floods. They drown, trapped in cars or swept away by fast-moving rivers. Then we have the emotional and financial cost of flooding. Lifelong possessions are lost, security disappears and there is the worry over restoration. How will we pay for it? Some insurance companies refuse to cover properties in certain areas because of the high risk of flooding. Therefore, some people may not have sufficient insurance to carry out the repairs to their flood damaged houses; others may have none. Rescue services regularly carry out flood simulation emergency practice where they get vital, realistic practice of what to do if the real thing should happen. This is welcome and will no doubt mean that they will be able to evacuate and save more people in the event of a massive flood. However, this is like a doctor treating the symptoms and not the cause of a problem. We need to prevent the flooding in the first place. It is accepted that we cannot reverse climate change, but we can certainly spend money on strengthening sea and river walls. There are also many ways in which people can improve defences to their own homes. The problem is that, as always, these things cost a lot of money. However, surely it is worth investing this money now, if it will prevent even greater monetary loss later. It is something that the government needs to take seriously because it’s a problem that is not going to go away 1. Incidences of flooding areresponsible for climate change.likely to increase.unpredictable300s
- Q2READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS Flooding: the new danger Areas in certain parts of the world have recently been hit by disastrous floods and others by a sequence of earthquakes. (Most of us know someone who has been caught up in the devastation caused by these events. Away from earthquake zones, one worrying problem these days is flooding and it is predicted that as a result of the changes in climate, this type of disaster will occur with greater frequency in the future, affecting millions of people. Indeed, if anything, the situation is likely to get worse. Many experts believe that those responsible will need to look at a range of measures, not just flood defences, but also land management schemes and even how we design our homes so that floods do less damage to property when they do occur and houses can be lived in again soon after the waters recede. It seems that our approach to flooding needs a complete rethink. There are many victims of flooding. Firstly, there are those (one in five people in Britain) who live in constant fear of heavy rainfall. Every time it rains for longer than a day or two, they ask, ‘Will it be us this time? Will it be our house that is flooded?’ After the fear, comes the reality; tons of water spilling over the river banks, into roads, houses and over fields. People become trapped in their own homes when the road becomes a river and need to be rescued by ill-prepared rescue services. And people die in floods. They drown, trapped in cars or swept away by fast-moving rivers. Then we have the emotional and financial cost of flooding. Lifelong possessions are lost, security disappears and there is the worry over restoration. How will we pay for it? Some insurance companies refuse to cover properties in certain areas because of the high risk of flooding. Therefore, some people may not have sufficient insurance to carry out the repairs to their flood damaged houses; others may have none. Rescue services regularly carry out flood simulation emergency practice where they get vital, realistic practice of what to do if the real thing should happen. This is welcome and will no doubt mean that they will be able to evacuate and save more people in the event of a massive flood. However, this is like a doctor treating the symptoms and not the cause of a problem. We need to prevent the flooding in the first place. It is accepted that we cannot reverse climate change, but we can certainly spend money on strengthening sea and river walls. There are also many ways in which people can improve defences to their own homes. The problem is that, as always, these things cost a lot of money. However, surely it is worth investing this money now, if it will prevent even greater monetary loss later. It is something that the government needs to take seriously because it’s a problem that is not going to go away 2. Rescue services are usuallyincompetentinadequate.ready for anything300s
- Q3READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS Flooding: the new danger Areas in certain parts of the world have recently been hit by disastrous floods and others by a sequence of earthquakes. (Most of us know someone who has been caught up in the devastation caused by these events. Away from earthquake zones, one worrying problem these days is flooding and it is predicted that as a result of the changes in climate, this type of disaster will occur with greater frequency in the future, affecting millions of people. Indeed, if anything, the situation is likely to get worse. Many experts believe that those responsible will need to look at a range of measures, not just flood defences, but also land management schemes and even how we design our homes so that floods do less damage to property when they do occur and houses can be lived in again soon after the waters recede. It seems that our approach to flooding needs a complete rethink. There are many victims of flooding. Firstly, there are those (one in five people in Britain) who live in constant fear of heavy rainfall. Every time it rains for longer than a day or two, they ask, ‘Will it be us this time? Will it be our house that is flooded?’ After the fear, comes the reality; tons of water spilling over the river banks, into roads, houses and over fields. People become trapped in their own homes when the road becomes a river and need to be rescued by ill-prepared rescue services. And people die in floods. They drown, trapped in cars or swept away by fast-moving rivers. Then we have the emotional and financial cost of flooding. Lifelong possessions are lost, security disappears and there is the worry over restoration. How will we pay for it? Some insurance companies refuse to cover properties in certain areas because of the high risk of flooding. Therefore, some people may not have sufficient insurance to carry out the repairs to their flood damaged houses; others may have none. Rescue services regularly carry out flood simulation emergency practice where they get vital, realistic practice of what to do if the real thing should happen. This is welcome and will no doubt mean that they will be able to evacuate and save more people in the event of a massive flood. However, this is like a doctor treating the symptoms and not the cause of a problem. We need to prevent the flooding in the first place. It is accepted that we cannot reverse climate change, but we can certainly spend money on strengthening sea and river walls. There are also many ways in which people can improve defences to their own homes. The problem is that, as always, these things cost a lot of money. However, surely it is worth investing this money now, if it will prevent even greater monetary loss later. It is something that the government needs to take seriously because it’s a problem that is not going to go away 3. The cost of flooding iscovered by insurancepurely financialalso psychological300s
- Q4READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS Flooding: the new danger Areas in certain parts of the world have recently been hit by disastrous floods and others by a sequence of earthquakes. (Most of us know someone who has been caught up in the devastation caused by these events. Away from earthquake zones, one worrying problem these days is flooding and it is predicted that as a result of the changes in climate, this type of disaster will occur with greater frequency in the future, affecting millions of people. Indeed, if anything, the situation is likely to get worse. Many experts believe that those responsible will need to look at a range of measures, not just flood defences, but also land management schemes and even how we design our homes so that floods do less damage to property when they do occur and houses can be lived in again soon after the waters recede. It seems that our approach to flooding needs a complete rethink. There are many victims of flooding. Firstly, there are those (one in five people in Britain) who live in constant fear of heavy rainfall. Every time it rains for longer than a day or two, they ask, ‘Will it be us this time? Will it be our house that is flooded?’ After the fear, comes the reality; tons of water spilling over the river banks, into roads, houses and over fields. People become trapped in their own homes when the road becomes a river and need to be rescued by ill-prepared rescue services. And people die in floods. They drown, trapped in cars or swept away by fast-moving rivers. Then we have the emotional and financial cost of flooding. Lifelong possessions are lost, security disappears and there is the worry over restoration. How will we pay for it? Some insurance companies refuse to cover properties in certain areas because of the high risk of flooding. Therefore, some people may not have sufficient insurance to carry out the repairs to their flood damaged houses; others may have none. Rescue services regularly carry out flood simulation emergency practice where they get vital, realistic practice of what to do if the real thing should happen. This is welcome and will no doubt mean that they will be able to evacuate and save more people in the event of a massive flood. However, this is like a doctor treating the symptoms and not the cause of a problem. We need to prevent the flooding in the first place. It is accepted that we cannot reverse climate change, but we can certainly spend money on strengthening sea and river walls. There are also many ways in which people can improve defences to their own homes. The problem is that, as always, these things cost a lot of money. However, surely it is worth investing this money now, if it will prevent even greater monetary loss later. It is something that the government needs to take seriously because it’s a problem that is not going to go away 4. Practicing for flood emergency doesn'thappen often enoughdeal with the root of the problemprovide realistic training300s
- Q5READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS Flooding: the new danger Areas in certain parts of the world have recently been hit by disastrous floods and others by a sequence of earthquakes. (Most of us know someone who has been caught up in the devastation caused by these events. Away from earthquake zones, one worrying problem these days is flooding and it is predicted that as a result of the changes in climate, this type of disaster will occur with greater frequency in the future, affecting millions of people. Indeed, if anything, the situation is likely to get worse. Many experts believe that those responsible will need to look at a range of measures, not just flood defences, but also land management schemes and even how we design our homes so that floods do less damage to property when they do occur and houses can be lived in again soon after the waters recede. It seems that our approach to flooding needs a complete rethink. There are many victims of flooding. Firstly, there are those (one in five people in Britain) who live in constant fear of heavy rainfall. Every time it rains for longer than a day or two, they ask, ‘Will it be us this time? Will it be our house that is flooded?’ After the fear, comes the reality; tons of water spilling over the river banks, into roads, houses and over fields. People become trapped in their own homes when the road becomes a river and need to be rescued by ill-prepared rescue services. And people die in floods. They drown, trapped in cars or swept away by fast-moving rivers. Then we have the emotional and financial cost of flooding. Lifelong possessions are lost, security disappears and there is the worry over restoration. How will we pay for it? Some insurance companies refuse to cover properties in certain areas because of the high risk of flooding. Therefore, some people may not have sufficient insurance to carry out the repairs to their flood damaged houses; others may have none. Rescue services regularly carry out flood simulation emergency practice where they get vital, realistic practice of what to do if the real thing should happen. This is welcome and will no doubt mean that they will be able to evacuate and save more people in the event of a massive flood. However, this is like a doctor treating the symptoms and not the cause of a problem. We need to prevent the flooding in the first place. It is accepted that we cannot reverse climate change, but we can certainly spend money on strengthening sea and river walls. There are also many ways in which people can improve defences to their own homes. The problem is that, as always, these things cost a lot of money. However, surely it is worth investing this money now, if it will prevent even greater monetary loss later. It is something that the government needs to take seriously because it’s a problem that is not going to go away 5. Investment in flood defences now isworth in the long runtoo expensivenot a serious proposition300s
- Q6READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS Flooding: the new danger Areas in certain parts of the world have recently been hit by disastrous floods and others by a sequence of earthquakes. (Most of us know someone who has been caught up in the devastation caused by these events. Away from earthquake zones, one worrying problem these days is flooding and it is predicted that as a result of the changes in climate, this type of disaster will occur with greater frequency in the future, affecting millions of people. Indeed, if anything, the situation is likely to get worse. Many experts believe that those responsible will need to look at a range of measures, not just flood defences, but also land management schemes and even how we design our homes so that floods do less damage to property when they do occur and houses can be lived in again soon after the waters recede. It seems that our approach to flooding needs a complete rethink. There are many victims of flooding. Firstly, there are those (one in five people in Britain) who live in constant fear of heavy rainfall. Every time it rains for longer than a day or two, they ask, ‘Will it be us this time? Will it be our house that is flooded?’ After the fear, comes the reality; tons of water spilling over the river banks, into roads, houses and over fields. People become trapped in their own homes when the road becomes a river and need to be rescued by ill-prepared rescue services. And people die in floods. They drown, trapped in cars or swept away by fast-moving rivers. Then we have the emotional and financial cost of flooding. Lifelong possessions are lost, security disappears and there is the worry over restoration. How will we pay for it? Some insurance companies refuse to cover properties in certain areas because of the high risk of flooding. Therefore, some people may not have sufficient insurance to carry out the repairs to their flood damaged houses; others may have none. Rescue services regularly carry out flood simulation emergency practice where they get vital, realistic practice of what to do if the real thing should happen. This is welcome and will no doubt mean that they will be able to evacuate and save more people in the event of a massive flood. However, this is like a doctor treating the symptoms and not the cause of a problem. We need to prevent the flooding in the first place. It is accepted that we cannot reverse climate change, but we can certainly spend money on strengthening sea and river walls. There are also many ways in which people can improve defences to their own homes. The problem is that, as always, these things cost a lot of money. However, surely it is worth investing this money now, if it will prevent even greater monetary loss later. It is something that the government needs to take seriously because it’s a problem that is not going to go away 6. Experts believe we need toredesign flooded housesconsider a variety of solutionsbuild more flood defences300s
- Q7The speaker liked inventing stories when she was a child.TRUEFALSE300s
- Q8Her friends didn’t like her being bossy.FALSETRUE300s
- Q9Teenagers don’t like performing because they are worried about how they look.TRUEFALSE300s
- Q10It was the appreciation of an audience that convinced her to work on the stage.TRUEFALSE300s
- Q11She regrets her career choice when she is unemployed.FALSETRUE300s
- Q12Choose the correct REPORTED FORM OF THE SENTENCE "Did you see the film on Channel 4 last night?" Dave asked Grant ........................... on Channel 4 the previous night.if he sawdid he seeif he had seenhad he seen60s
- Q13Choose the correct REPORTED FORM of the sentence "No, I didn’t, but I recorded it. Grant said that he hadn’t, but that ........................... it."he had recordedhe recordedhe did record60s
- Q14Choose the correct REPORTED FORM of the sentence "Is it good? He asked ................................"if it was goodis it good?was it good60s
- Q15Choose the correct REPORTED FORM of the sentence " I think it’s excellent. he said he ......................."thought it was excellentthinks it was excellentthought it would be excellent60s