Question 1

Which of the following best describes South Carolina's view on federalism during the debates over slavery and the Constitution?

Accepted Answer

South Carolina believed in strong state rights that prioritized state sovereignty over federal authority.

Answer

South Carolina sought compromises that favored federal oversight.

Answer

South Carolina aimed for equal power between states and the federal government.

Answer

South Carolina supported a stronger federal government to impose national laws.

Question 2

What was a major point of contention between South Carolina and the federal government regarding the Constitution?

Accepted Answer

South Carolina opposed any federal laws that could potentially abolish slavery.

Answer

South Carolina wanted to increase federal taxes on Northern states.

Answer

South Carolina aimed to reduce tariffs on international goods exclusively.

Answer

South Carolina sought to eliminate the Electoral College system.

Question 3

How did South Carolina justify its position on slavery in relation to the Constitution during its debates with the federal government?

Accepted Answer

South Carolina argued that the Constitution implicitly protected slavery by allowing states to govern themselves.

Answer

South Carolina insisted the Constitution mandated federal control over all states on slavery issues.

Answer

South Carolina claimed the Constitution explicitly endorsed the abolition of slavery.

Answer

South Carolina believed the Constitution required uniformity in state laws regarding slavery.

Question 4

What was South Carolina's primary argument against federal interference in their practices regarding slavery?

Accepted Answer

South Carolina argued that states had the sovereign right to decide on the legality of slavery within their borders.

Answer

South Carolina suggested slavery was explicitly supported by everyone in the Union.

Answer

South Carolina believed only economic factors could dictate slavery laws federally.

Answer

South Carolina claimed slavery was protected by international law.

Question 5

In the debates over federalism, how did South Carolina's leaders view the relationship between state laws and the federal constitution?

Accepted Answer

They believed state laws should take precedence if there was a conflict with federal laws.

Answer

They thought state courts should decide whether state or federal laws were valid.

Answer

They believed state laws should always align with the majority decision of all states.

Answer

They accepted that federal laws were superior to state laws in all circumstances.

Question 6

What was South Carolina's perspective on the Constitution's ability to regulate slavery across states?

Accepted Answer

South Carolina asserted that the Constitution did not grant the federal government power to regulate slavery within individual states.

Answer

South Carolina believed the Constitution gave Congress the power to abolish slavery nationwide.

Answer

South Carolina viewed the Constitution as a tool for federal government to unify state laws on slavery.

Answer

South Carolina argued the Constitution required all states to maintain slavery.

Question 7

During the debates between South Carolina and the federal government, what was South Carolina's main concern about federalism?

Accepted Answer

South Carolina was concerned that federalism might weaken state sovereignty and threaten the institution of slavery.

Answer

South Carolina feared federalism would force states to adopt a single economic policy.

Answer

South Carolina worried federalism would lead to excessive military control by the federal government.

Answer

South Carolina was concerned federalism would create unequal representation for smaller states.

Question 8

In the debates over the Constitution, what was a primary argument made by South Carolina in defense of slavery?

Accepted Answer

South Carolina argued that slavery was essential to their economic prosperity and social order.

Answer

South Carolina claimed slavery was a temporary solution to labor shortages.

Answer

South Carolina believed slavery was necessary to maintain international relations.

Answer

South Carolina insisted slavery was fundamentally supported by the Northern states.

Question 9

How did South Carolina's leaders justify their stance on states' rights during debates with the federal government?

Accepted Answer

They argued that the federal government was overreaching its constitutional authority at the expense of state sovereignty.

Answer

They claimed states' rights should be secondary to international diplomacy.

Answer

They argued that states' rights allowed states to form independent foreign policies.

Answer

They believed states' rights were only applicable to economic legislation, not social issues.

Question 10

What was South Carolina's perspective on the federal government's role in resolving disputes over slavery as outlined in the Constitution?

Accepted Answer

South Carolina believed the federal government should not interfere, leaving decisions on slavery to individual states.

Answer

South Carolina wanted the federal government to enforce a national ban on slavery.

Answer

South Carolina expected the federal government to support the expansion of slavery to new territories.

Answer

South Carolina believed the federal government should create a national referendum on slavery.

Related quizzes

Related quizzes