
Supreme Court Landmark Cases.3
Quiz by Erin O'Rourke
Feel free to use or edit a copy
includes Teacher and Student dashboards
Measure skillsfrom any curriculum
Tag the questions with any skills you have. Your dashboard will track each student's mastery of each skill.
- edit the questions
- save a copy for later
- start a class game
- automatically assign follow-up activities based on students’ scores
- assign as homework
- share a link with colleagues
- print as a bubble sheet
- Q1
This case in 1969 said that some forms of protest by public school students are constitutionally protected as long as they do not interrupt the learning of others.
Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier
Plessy v Ferguson
US v Nixon
Tinker v Des Moines
30s - Q2
This case in 1963 determined that the right to counsel in felony criminal cases is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial. Therefore, this protection from the Sixth Amendment applied to state courts as well as federal courts. State courts must appoint counsel (public defenders) to represent defendants who cannot afford to pay for their own lawyers.
Gideon v Wainwright
Tinker v Des Moines
Miranda v Arizona
Gibbons v Ogden
30s - Q3
This case in 1989 determined that the burning of the flag of the United States was a constitutionally protected form of free speech.
Gideon v Wainwright
Texas v Johnson
Marbury v Madison
Miranda v Arizona
30s - Q4
This case in 2015 held that same sex marriage is protected by the 14th amendment’s Equal Protection Clause and the Constitution’s Article IV Full Faith and Credit Clause.
Korematsu v US
Mapp v Ohio
Roe v Wade
Obergefell v Hodges
30s - Q5
This case in 1954 said that the "separate but equal" principle is inherently unequal, and therefore unconstitutional.
Plessy v Ferguson
Roe v Wade
Marbury v Madison
Brown v Board of Education
30s - Q6
This case in 1988 held that public school administrators can censor articles in school newspapers.
Tinker v Des Moines
TLO v New Jersey
US v Nixon
Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier
30s - Q7
This case in 1857 held that enslaved people were not free even if they lawfully lived in free states.
Gibbons v Ogden
Tinker v Des Moines
Brown v Board of Education
Dred Scott v Sanford
30s - Q8
This case in 1896 held that racial segregation was legal and established the "separate but equal" principle.
Brown v Board of Education
Plessy v Ferguson
30s - Q9
This case in 1803 established the precedent of Judicial Review.
Korematsu v US
Texas v Johnson
Marbury v Madison
Dred Scott v Sanford
30s - Q10
This case in 1966 established that those held in police custody were entitled to a warning about their right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel.
Texas v Johnson
Korematsu v US
Mapp v Ohio
Miranda v Arizona
30s - Q11
This case established that the Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment and the 9th Amendment’s “rights to the people,” included the right to abortion with regulation.
Mapp v Ohio
Obergefell v Hodges
Roe v Wade
NJ v TLO
30s - Q12
This case in 1974 established the principle that executive privilege is not absolute.
US v Nixon
Mapp v Ohio
Miranda v Arizona
Texas v Johnson
30s - Q13
This case in 1961 found that the Exclusionary Rule applied to “unlawfully gotten” evidence in both federal and state courts.
Gideon v Wainwright
US v Nixon
Miranda v Arizona
Mapp v Ohio
30s - Q14
In 1985, this case established the precedent that public school searches without a warrant are constitutional if there is “probable cause and reasonable belief” that a crime is being committed by a student.
Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier
Mapp v Ohio
Miranda v Arizona
NJ v TLO
30s - Q15
This case in 1944 held up the constitutionality of internment camps for Japanese Americans under the special war time powers of the executive branch. Executive Order 9066 was later vacated and this precedent overturned.
Korematsu v US
Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier
Texas v Johnson
US v Nixon
30s