The Three-fifth Compromise | Quizalize

My Classes
Find resources
My Library
Create

Loading...

The Three-fifth Compromise | Quizalize

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

placeholder image to represent content

The Three-fifth Compromise

Quiz by Chris Ward

Customize this quiz to suit your class

Instantly translate to 100+ languages

Measure skills

from any curriculum

Tag the questions with any skills you have. Your dashboard will track each student's mastery of each skill.

Give this quiz to my class

as a classroom game

as homework

as an exam

as a printed PDF

Q 1/6
Score 0
Representation and direct taxes will be determine by the size of each states' population
30
False
True
Q 2/6
Score 0
Apportioned means
30
divided among
All of the Above
distributed

6 questions

Q.

Representation and direct taxes will be determine by the size of each states' population

1

30 sec

Q.

Apportioned means

2

30 sec

Q.

"Those that are bond to service for a term of years" is referring to what types of people

3

30 sec

Q.

Based on the 3/5 compromise representation will be determine every

4

30 sec

Q.

According to the document who will be counted as 3/5 of a person when determining the population and representation of each state

5

30 sec

Q.

According to the 3/5 compromise number of representative will not exceed one for every____________ people.

6

30 sec

Related quizzes

The Three-Fifths Compromise of 1787 (Story)
The Three-Fifths Compromise of 1787 (Article)
The Three-Fifths Compromise - Exit Quiz
The Three Fifths Compromise (1-4)
The Three-Fifths Compromise - Starter Quiz
The Three-Fifths Compromise of 1787 (Conversation)
Anti-Federalists, Articles of Confederation, constitution, Constitutional Convention, Electoral College, Enlightenment, Federalists, Great Compromise, Northwest Ordinance, Northwest Territory, ratify, republic, The Federalist Papers, Three-Fifths Compromise
Dred Scott was born enslaved in Virginia in 1799. In 1833, he was purchased by Dr. John Emerson, an army surgeon, living in Missouri. At the time, the U.S. was divided into free states (where slavery was outlawed) and slave states (where slavery was allowed). The Missouri Compromise of 1820 made Missouri a slave state. But it also outlawed slavery in any territory north of it. In 1833, Dr. Emerson was assigned to a fort in Illinois, and later, a fort in the Wisconsin Territory. He took Dred Scott with him. They lived in these areas for years. Even though slavery was outlawed in both places, Emerson never freed Scott. Eventually, Scott was sent back to Missouri to live with Emerson’s wife, Eliza Sanford*. After the doctor died in 1843, Scott tried to buy his freedom. Sanford refused. With the support of his church, abolitionists, and friends, Scott sued to get it. His case ended up going all the way to the Supreme Court. The Arguments Scott sued using two Missouri laws. One said any person held in wrongful enslavement could sue for their freedom. The other stated any person taken to a free territory was automatically free, and could not be re-enslaved. Sanford argued that the Missouri laws applied only to someone moving to free areas by choice. Dr. Emerson was ordered by the army to move to his posts. Sanford also said that military authority was greater than the states’. And since they lived on military bases, Emerson did not have to follow state or territory laws. The Decision In a 7–2 decision, the Court ruled that Dred Scott was not free. Chief Justice Roger Taney stated that all people of African descent, free or enslaved, were not U.S. citizens. They did not have rights, like the power to vote or sue in court, so Scott’s case was invalid. But Taney did not stop there. He added that, because enslaved people were property, the Fifth Amendment protected the rights of enslavers. The Fifth Amendment says the government can’t take someone’s property without going through the courts or paying for it. Laws that banned slavery, like the Missouri Compromise, were unconstitutional. No level of government, Taney said, state or federal, could outlaw slavery.