Which of the following is NOT a valid triangle congruence postulate?

Which postulate states that two triangles are congruent if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are equal to the corresponding sides and angle of another triangle?

What postulate can be used to prove that two triangles are congruent if all three sides of one triangle are equal to all three sides of another triangle?

If two angles and a non-included side of one triangle are equal to the corresponding two angles and non-included side of another triangle, which postulate is used to prove their congruence?

Which triangle congruence postulate can be applied if two angles and the included side of one triangle are equal to the corresponding two angles and included side of another triangle?

What postulate can be used to show that two triangles are congruent if one triangle has two sides equal to two sides of another triangle and the angles between those sides are also equal?

Which postulate states that if two triangles have one side equal to one side of another triangle and the angles opposite those sides are also equal, the triangles are congruent?

In what scenario can you use the SSS (Side-Side-Side) postulate to prove two triangles are congruent?

Which postulate allows you to prove that two triangles are congruent if two angles and the side between them in one triangle are equal to the corresponding two angles and the side in another triangle?

Which triangle congruence postulate is applicable when you know two sides and a non-included angle of one triangle are equal to two sides and the corresponding non-included angle of another triangle?