
Writing Discussion
Quiz by Haseena
Feel free to use or edit a copy
includes Teacher and Student dashboards
Measure skillsfrom any curriculum
Measure skills
from any curriculum
Tag the questions with any skills you have. Your dashboard will track each student's mastery of each skill.
With a free account, teachers can
- edit the questions
- save a copy for later
- start a class game
- automatically assign follow-up activities based on students’ scores
- assign as homework
- share a link with colleagues
- print as a bubble sheet
20 questions
Show answers
- Q1What is the main goal of the discussion section in a research paper?To summarize the paperTo introduce new research topicsTo present the research methodologyTo describe, analyze, and interpret the findings of the research.30s
- Q2How does a discussion section differ from a conclusion?A conclusion analyzes the researchA discussion is a thorough examination of results, while a conclusion summarizes the paper.A discussion is shorter than a conclusionThey both serve the same purpose30s
- Q3What is the first step in structuring a discussion section?Restate the research methodologyDiscuss limitations of the studyProvide recommendations for future researchSummarize the key findings and link them to the initial research question.30s
- Q4Why is it important to address limitations in the discussion section?To ignore the research findingsAddressing limitations helps build your credibility as a writer.To confuse the readerTo lengthen the paper30s
- Q5What should a researcher do with unexpected results in their discussion section?Summarize them without analysisIgnore themMention and discuss them, providing interpretation for their occurrence.Only mention them if they support the hypothesis30s
- Q6What is recommended to include regarding future research in the discussion section?Provide a brief look at potential follow-up research studies.Criticize existing researchAdd detailed plans for the next studyAvoid mentioning future studies30s
- Q7According to the text, what is a common pitfall to avoid in the discussion section?Drawing conclusions without support from the data or references.Summarizing results at lengthFocusing too much on methodologyProviding too many references30s
- Q8In the context of a discussion section, what should be avoided?Summarizing key findingsBringing up new information not included in the results section.Referencing existing literatureAnalyzing results30s
- Q9What is an essential element to restate in the conclusion of a discussion section?The theoretical frameworkThe method of data collectionThe most significant findings and their implications.Unrelated research topics30s
- Q10What type of literature should be referred to in the discussion section?Pre-existing literature that shows how the findings fit in or disagree with prior research.Only recent studiesUnrelated articlesPersonal opinions30s
- Q11What is the primary purpose of the discussion section in a research paper?To list references used in the paperTo describe, analyze, and interpret the findings of the research.To summarize the entire research paperTo present new information not mentioned before30s
- Q12How does a discussion section differ from a conclusion?They are the same thing, just different namesA discussion section is a thorough analysis of results, while a conclusion is a brief summary of the paper.A discussion is only about unexpected resultsA conclusion is longer and more detailed than a discussion30s
- Q13What is the first step to structuring a discussion section?Provide recommendations for future studiesSummarize the key findings from the research and link them to the initial research question.Restate the major conclusions brieflyDiscuss limitations of the research30s
- Q14Why is it important to discuss limitations in a research paper's discussion section?To confuse the reader about the findingsTo make the discussion section longerIt is unnecessary, as all research is perfectAddressing limitations builds credibility and demonstrates critical thinking about the study.30s
- Q15What should be done with unexpected results in a discussion section?Only mention them if they support the hypothesisIgnore them as they are not relevantList them without any explanationDescribe them and provide a reasonable interpretation of their significance.30s