Loading...
YEAR FIVE ISL 101
Quiz by evelyn odoko
Customize this quiz to suit your class
Instantly translate to 100+ languages
Tag the questions with any skills you have. Your dashboard will track each student's mastery of each skill.
Give this quiz to my class
âOne of the other members of the family that cannot be found in a nuclear family is the ______
Grand parents
father
mother
children
âWhich of the following is an obligation of other people living in our family?
Teaching the children how to cause trouble
Teaching the children how to be lazy
Teaching them how to be wasteful
Teaching the children our native languages
One of the other members of the family that cannot be found in a nuclear family is the ______
Which of the following is an obligation of other people living in our family?
Father mother and children are members of a ___________ family
____________ tales are traditional and customs stories of a particular area
Correcting good behaviour in the family gives the younger ones ___________ upbringing
Accomodating and feeding other members of the family is a way of showing ____
Tolerating other people in our family is a sign of living __________
A male child in the Yoruba tradition is expected to ____
Which of the following is not a way of caring for children in the family?
Which of the following will be a role expected of other people living in the family?
HALCYON ONLINE CLASS-YEAR FIVE ISL CLASSWORK-ISL YEAR FIVEYear Five ICT ExamYEAR FIVE GENERAL KNOWLEDGE QUIZ FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN RPMS Quiz: Quality vs. Efficiency 1. A teacher spends five hours creating a highly interactive digital game for a single 40-minute lesson. This is an example of prioritizing: ⢠A) Quality over Efficiency ⢠B) Efficiency over Quality ⢠C) Administrative Competence ⢠D) Resource Management ⢠Hint: The focus is on high-level engagement, but the time investment is very high. 2. Which of the following best describes "Efficiency" in the context of the RPMS? ⢠A) Submitting all MOVs and reports on or before the deadline with minimal errors. ⢠B) Ensuring 100% of students pass the quarterly examination. ⢠C) Creating the most aesthetically pleasing portfolio in the department. ⢠D) Conducting home visits for every single student in a class of 50. ⢠Hint: Look for the option that emphasizes timeliness and resource use. 3. Using a "template" or a "reusable slide deck" for lesson planning is a strategy to improve: ⢠A) Efficiency ⢠B) Instructional Diversity ⢠C) Subject Matter Mastery ⢠D) Classroom Discipline ⢠Hint: Templates reduce the time spent on repetitive formatting. 4. If a teacher provides detailed, personalized feedback to every student but submits the grades two weeks late, they have achieved: ⢠A) High Quality, Low Efficiency ⢠B) Low Quality, High Efficiency ⢠C) High Quality, High Efficiency ⢠D) Low Quality, Low Efficiency ⢠Hint: The work itself is excellent, but the timing is poor. 5. Which tool improves Efficiency without sacrificing the Quality of assessment data? ⢠A) Automated Google Forms for multiple-choice quizzes. ⢠B) Giving everyone a passing grade to save time on checking. ⢠C) Writing long paragraphs of feedback on 200 paper-based essays. ⢠D) Skipping assessments entirely to finish the syllabus faster. ⢠Hint: Look for a balance where technology handles the "busy work." 6. When discussing Quality in your RPMS portfolio, which "Means of Verification" (MOV) is most appropriate? ⢠A) Sample of student work with constructive teacher comments. ⢠B) A logbook showing you arrived at school at 7:00 AM daily. ⢠C) A certificate for attending a 1-hour webinar. ⢠D) A photo of your organized teacher's cabinet. ⢠Hint: Quality is evidenced by the impact on student learning. 7. The concept of "Doing the right things" (Effectiveness) represents: ⢠A) Quality ⢠B) Efficiency ⢠C) Speed ⢠D) Compliance ⢠Hint: "Doing the right things" is about results; "Doing things right" is about process. 8. How does "Efficiency" help a teacher maintain "Quality" in the long run? ⢠A) It prevents burnout by optimizing workload, leaving energy for creative teaching. ⢠B) It allows the teacher to take more side jobs. ⢠C) It ensures the teacher never has to talk to parents. ⢠D) It proves that the teacher is smarter than their peers. ⢠Hint: Consider the relationship between teacher well-being and performance. 9. If a teacher's RPMS rating for Quality is 5 (Outstanding) but Efficiency is 2 (Fair), what is the most likely reason? ⢠A) The teacher produces excellent work but often misses deadlines. ⢠B) The teacher is very fast but makes many mistakes in their reports. ⢠C) The teacher is both slow and produces poor results. ⢠D) The students are failing despite the teacher being very organized. ⢠Hint: Check the gap between the high-standard output and the slow delivery. 10. What is the ultimate goal of balancing Quality and Efficiency in the PPST-RPMS? ⢠A) To achieve sustainable professional excellence that benefits the learners. ⢠B) To get a higher salary increase only. ⢠C) To impress the School Head during the observation. ⢠D) To finish the school year with the least amount of work possible. ⢠Hint: It's about long-term growth for both teacher and student. ________________________________________ Answer Key: 1. A | 2. A | 3. A | 4. A | 5. A | 6. A | 7. A | 8. A | 9. A | 10. A ________________________________________When it was his turn to speak, Adam Malik, Presidium Minister for Political Affairs and Minister for Foreign Affairs of Indonesia, recalled that about a year before, in Bangkok, at the conclusion of the peace talks between Indonesia and Malaysia, he had explored the idea of an organization such as ASEAN with his Malaysian and Thai counterparts. One of the âangry young menâ in his countryâs struggle for independence two decades earlier, Adam Malik was then 50 years old and one of a Presidium of five led by then General Soeharto that was steering Indonesia from the verge of economic and political chaos. He was the Presidiumâs point man in Indonesiaâs efforts to mend fences with its neighbors in the wake of an unfortunate policy of confrontation. During the past year, he said, the Ministers had all worked together toward the realization of the ASEAN idea, âmaking haste slowly, in order to build a new association for regional cooperation.â Adam Malik went on to describe Indonesiaâs vision of a Southeast Asia developing into âa region which can stand on its own feet, strong enough to defend itself against any negative influence from outside the region.â Such a vision, he stressed, was not wishful thinking, if the countries of the region effectively cooperated with each other, considering their combined natural resources and manpower. He referred to differences of outlook among the member countries, but those differences, he said, would be overcome through a maximum of goodwill and understanding, faith and realism. Hard work, patience and perseverance, he added, would also be necessary. The countries of Southeast Asia should also be willing to take responsibility for whatever happens to them, according to Tun Abdul Razak, the Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia, who spoke next. In his speech, he conjured a vision of an ASEAN that would include all the countries of Southeast Asia. Tun Abdul Razak was then concurrently his countryâs Minister of Defence and Minister of National Development. It was a time when national survival was the overriding thrust of Malaysiaâs relations with other nations and so as Minister of Defence, he was in charge of his countryâs foreign affairs. He stressed that the countries of the region should recognize that unless they assumed their common responsibility to shape their own destiny and to prevent external intervention and interference, Southeast Asia would remain fraught with danger and tension. And unless they took decisive and collective action to prevent the eruption of intra-regional conflicts, the nations of Southeast Asia would remain susceptible to manipulation, one against another. âWe the nations and peoples of Southeast Asia,â Tun Abdul Razak said, âmust get together and form by ourselves a new perspective and a new framework for our region. It is important that individually and jointly we should create a deep awareness that we cannot survive for long as independent but isolated peoples unless we also think and act together and unless we prove by deeds that we belong to a family of Southeast Asian nations bound together by ties of friendship and goodwill and imbued with our own ideals and aspirations and determined to shape our own destinyâ. He added that, âwith the establishment of ASEAN, we have taken a firm and a bold step on that roadâ. For his part, S. Rajaratnam, a former Minister of Culture of multi-cultural Singapore who, at that time, served as its first Foreign Minister, noted that two decades of nationalist fervor had not fulfilled the expectations of the people of Southeast Asia for better living standards. If ASEAN would succeed, he said, then its members would have to marry national thinking with regional thinking. âWe must now think at two levels,â Rajaratnam said. âWe must think not only of our national interests but posit them against regional interests: that is a new way of thinking about our problems. And these are two different things and sometimes they can conflict. Secondly, we must also accept the fact, if we are really serious about it, that regional existence means painful adjustments to those practices and thinking in our respective countries. We must make these painful and difficult adjustments. If we are not going to do that, then regionalism remains a utopia.â S. Rajaratnam expressed the fear, however, that ASEAN would be misunderstood. âWe are not against anythingâ, he said, ânot against anybodyâ. And here he used a term that would have an ominous ring even today: balkanization. In Southeast Asia, as in Europe and any part of the world, he said, outside powers had a vested interest in the balkanization of the region. âWe want to ensure,â he said, âa stable Southeast Asia, not a balkanized Southeast Asia. And those countries who are interested, genuinely interested, in the stability of Southeast Asia, the prosperity of Southeast Asia, and better economic and social conditions, will welcome small countries getting together to pool their collective resources and their collective wisdom to contribute to the peace of the world.â The goal of ASEAN, then, is to create, not to destroy. This, the Foreign Minister of Thailand, Thanat Khoman, stressed when it was his turn to speak. At a time when the Vietnam conflict was raging and American forces seemed forever entrenched in Indochina, he had foreseen their eventual withdrawal from the area and had accordingly applied himself to adjusting Thailandâs foreign policy to a reality that would only become apparent more than half a decade later. He must have had that in mind when, on that occasion, he said that the countries of Southeast Asia had no choice but to adjust to the exigencies of the time, to move toward closer cooperation and even integration. Elaborating on ASEAN objectives, he spoke of âbuilding a new society that will be responsive to the needs of our time and efficiently equipped to bring about, for the enjoyment and the material as well as spiritual advancement of our peoples, conditions of stability and progress. Particularly what millions of men and women in our part of the world want is to erase the old and obsolete concept of domination and subjection of the past and replace it with the new spirit of give and take, of equality and partnership. More than anything else, they want to be master of their own house and to enjoy the inherent right to decide their own destiny âŚâ While the nations of Southeast Asia prevent attempts to deprive them of their freedom and sovereignty, he said, they must first free themselves from the material impediments of ignorance, disease and hunger. Each of these nations cannot accomplish that alone, but by joining together and cooperating with those who have the same aspirations, these objectives become easier to attain. Then Thanat Khoman concluded: âWhat we have decided today is only a small beginning of what we hope will be a long and continuous sequence of accomplishments of which we ourselves, those who will join us later and the generations to come, can be proud. Let it be for Southeast Asia, a potentially rich region, rich in history, in spiritual as well as material resources and indeed for the whole ancient continent of Asia, the light of happiness and well-being that will shine over the uncounted millions of our struggling peoples.â The Foreign Minister of Thailand closed the inaugural session of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations by presenting each of his colleagues with a memento. Inscribed on the memento presented to the Foreign Minister of Indonesia, was the citation, âIn recognition of services rendered by His Excellency Adam Malik to the ASEAN organization, the name of which was suggested by him.â And that was how ASEAN was conceived, given a name, and born. It had been barely 14 months since Thanat Khoman brought up the ASEAN idea in his conversations with his Malaysian and Indonesian colleagues. In about three more weeks, Indonesia would fully restore diplomatic relations with Malaysia, and soon after that with Singapore. That was by no means the end to intra-ASEAN disputes, for soon the Philippines and Malaysia would have a falling out on the issue of sovereignty over Sabah. Many disputes between ASEAN countries persist to this day. But all Member Countries are deeply committed to resolving their differences through peaceful means and in the spirit of mutual accommodation. Every dispute would have its proper season but it would not be allowed to get in the way of the task at hand. And at that time, the essential task was to lay the framework of regional dialogue and cooperation. The two-page Bangkok Declaration not only contains the rationale for the establishment of ASEAN and its specific objectives. It represents the organizationâs modus operandi of building on small steps, voluntary, and informal arrangements towards more binding and institutionalized agreements. All the founding member states and the newer members have stood fast to the spirit of the Bangkok Declaration. Over the years, ASEAN has progressively entered into several formal and legally-binding instruments, such as the 1976 Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia and the 1995 Treaty on the Southeast Asia Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone. Against the backdrop of conflict in the then Indochina, the Founding Fathers had the foresight of building a community of and for all Southeast Asian states. Thus the Bangkok Declaration promulgated that âthe Association is open for participation to all States in the Southeast Asian region subscribing to the aforementioned aims, principles and purposes.â ASEANâs inclusive outlook has paved the way for community-building not only in Southeast Asia, but also in the broader Asia Pacific region where several other inter-governmental organizations now co-exist. The original ASEAN logo presented five brown sheaves of rice stalks, one for each founding member. Beneath the sheaves is the legend âASEANâ in blue. These are set on a field of yellow encircled by a blue border. Brown stands for strength and stability, yellow for prosperity and blue for the spirit of cordiality in which ASEAN affairs are conducted. When ASEAN celebrated its 30th Anniversary in 1997, the sheaves on the logo had increased to ten â representing all ten countries of Southeast Asia and reflecting the colors of the flags of all of them. In a very real sense, ASEAN and Southeast Asia would then be one and the same, just as the Founding Fathers had envisioned. This article is based on the first chapter of ASEAN at 30, a publication of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in commemoration of its 30th Anniversary on 8 August 1997, written by Jamil Maidan Flores and Jun Abad.Write short simple RCQ for beginners using: SISI: Do you have any shoes like these? SHOP ASSISTANT: What size? SISI: Size five. SHOP ASSISTANT: What colour? SISI: Black. SHOP ASSISTANT: I'm sorry. We don't have any. SISI: But my sister bought this pair last month. SHOP ASSISTANT: Did she buy them here? SISI: No, she bought them in the U.S. SHOP ASSISTANT: We had some shoes like those a month ago, but we don't have any now. SISI: Can you get a pair for me, please? SHOP ASSISTANT: I'm afraid that I can't. They were in fashion last year and the year before last. But they're not in fashion this year. SHOP ASSISTANT: These shoes are in fashion now. SISI: They look very uncomfortable. SHOP ASSISTANT: They are very uncomfortable. But women always wear uncomfortable shoes!