Question 1

It has been defined by the supreme court as negligence characterized by

the want of even slight care, acting or omitting an act in a situation where there

is a duty to act, not inadvertently but willfully and intentionally with a conscious

indifference to consequence insofar as other persons may be affected.

Accepted Answer

Gross Neglect of duty

Answer

grave misconduct

Answer

mitigating circumstance

Answer

gross misconduct

Question 2

Supposing Mr. F the father of P a Grade 7 student of a public secondary

school in Pampanga, filed a complaint for grave misconduct against Mr. T, a

teacher of P. Finding the complaint not under oath and not written in clear,

simple and concise language, Dr. RD, the Regional Director of region III issued

an order dismissing the complaint. Is the order proper?

Accepted Answer

Yes, the complaint is not under oath and not written in clear

Answer

Yes, Administrative charges against a teacher shall be heard initially by a

committee composed of the corresponding School Superintendent of the

Division or a duly authorized representative who should at least have the rank of

a division supervisor

Answer

No, because the parent follow the correct process of filing a complaint

Answer

No, the parent has the right to be heard as stipulated in BP 232 to exercise

their right to develop themselves within the context of their cultures, customs,

traditions, interest and belief

Question 3

Which of the following actions could be a ground for an administrative

complaint?

I. Inefficiency and incompetence in the performance of official duties.

II. Conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude.

BI. Borrowing money by superior officers from subordinates.

IV. Lending by subordinates to superior officers.

Accepted Answer

I II and III only

Answer

I, II, III and IV

Answer

I and II only

Answer

II and IV only

Related quizzes