Loading...
Weekly refresher 1/23/26
Quiz by Arvin Adan
Tag the questions with any skills you have. Your dashboard will track each student's mastery of each skill.
​On the top side of the road, do we still consider placing a virtual LM there?
No, since the detection is inappropriate, we should not add LM on those small detections.
Yes, because the person beside you said to add it.
No, add a Needs Review object; this should be asked to the client.
Yes, since it is located on the side of the road and detection remains continuous.
If a bicycle area on the road starts or ends from a sidewalk, should it be marked as a bicycle crossing?
On the top side of the road, do we still consider placing a virtual LM there?
Is the marking here correct?
Is the marking here correct?
In the Munich suburb map, where the road is straight, what should we do if we encounter a location on the side of the road with solid detection data and the LM appears solid in the top view, but there is no street view available? Which LM subtype should we tag?
We’ve encountered a scenario where the LM detection seems good, but the background is slightly erased or blurry. However, when viewed in Street View, it appears as a dashed LM. Which LM subtype should we add or place?
If the scenario appears like the one shown in the image, which tag should we consider placing on those red paint on the road?
Is the marking of the polygon correct in this scenario?
In this scenario, should this be considered a bicycle crossing?
Is the marking in this scenario correct?
If we see a paint mark on the road but it does not function as a road marking (such as a dashed or solid line), what tag should we apply?
If we encounter cracks and tar seams on the road, what markings should we apply?
What is the best way to perfect a tile?
What tag should be our priority when we see a bicycle crossing that can also be used by pedestrians?
What is the use of Lasso select on the control panel?
