CLJ QUIZ 1

Jenny killing her own son whose age is less than three years old.

PO2 Robert has witnessed an actual commission of a crime and promptly arrested the perpetrator even without a warrant and hasn’t stated his rights due to some inevitable circumstances regarding the apprehension made. Which of the following inevitable circumstances for not stating the rights might be applicable in the situation stated above?

The legal effect if there is a provisional dismissal of offenses punishable by imprisonment not exceeding 6 years or a fine of any amount, or both.

Man is essentially a moral creature with an absolute free will to choose between good and evil thereby placing more stress upon the effect or result of the felonious act than upon the man, the criminal himself.

Penal laws and those of public security and safety shall be obligatory upon all who live or sojourn in the Philippine territory, subject to the principles of public international law and to treaty stipulations.

To be state witness, one of the accused must voluntarily execute a sworn statement in support of his discharge. If the court denies the motion to discharge said accused filed before the prosecution rest its case, his sworn statement shall be as

This involves the use of punitive and disciplinary measures such as solitary confinement to modify or reform criminal behavior whose conduct and deportment is not totally responding to rehabilitation programs.

They shall render legal advice on matters involving questions of law to the Punong Barangay or any Lupon or Pangkat member whenever necessary in the exercise of his functions in the administration of the Katarungang Pambarangay, EXCEPT:

It is a warrant issued by a court bearing its seal and the signature of the judge directing the jail or prison authorities to receive the convicted offender for service of sentence.

A who was arrested as a suspect in a murder case was not represented by counsel during the Q and A stage, However, before he was asked to sign his statements to the police investigator, the latter provided A with a counsel, who happened to beat the police station. After conferring with A, the counsel told the police investigator that A was ready to sign the statements.Can the statements of A be presented in court as his confession?

An ex post facto law is a law which describes the following except:

In robbery with homicide, the law requires that the homicide be committed with intent to kill.

M left his house together with R, to attend a public dance. Two hours late, they decided to have a drink. Not long after, M left to look for a place to relieve himself. According to R, he was only about three meters from M who was relieving himself when a short man walked past him, approached M and stabbed him at the side. M retaliated by striking his assailant with a halffilled bottle of beer. Almost simultaneously, a group of seven men, ganged up on M and hit him with assorted weapons, i.e. bamboo poles, stones, and pieces of wood. R, who was petrified, could only watch helplessly as M was being mauled and overpowered by his assailants. M fell to the ground and died before he could be given any medical assistance. What crime is committed in the given case?

Totoy demanded from the victim “tol pera pera lang to dahil kailangan lang. The victim refused to part with his earnings and resisted. He even tried to get out of the taxicab but Totoy pulled him back and stabbed him. Randy, Rot-Rot and Jon-Jon followed suit and stabbed the victim with their bladed weapons.The victim was able to flee from the vehicle without anything being taken from him. The robbery in this case is:

A killed B by stabbing B in the heart which resulted to B’s death. The witness is the wife of the victim, who said that a day prior to the killing. A threatened B. Is there a qualifying circumstance in this case?