Wrongful conviction | Quizalize

My Classes
Find resources
My Library
Create

Loading...

Wrongful conviction | Quizalize

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

placeholder image to represent content

Wrongful conviction

Quiz by NOA SABELA SAURA DE LA PEÑA

Customize this quiz to suit your class

Instantly translate to 100+ languages

Measure skills

from any curriculum

Tag the questions with any skills you have. Your dashboard will track each student's mastery of each skill.

Give this quiz to my class

as a classroom game

as homework

as an exam

as a printed PDF

Q 1/10
Score 0
How many years did Josh spend in prison?
30
30
13
Q 2/10
Score 0
Was Charlotte at the supermarket when the siege occurred?
30
yes
no

10 questions

Q.

How many years did Josh spend in prison?

1

30 sec

Q.

Was Charlotte at the supermarket when the siege occurred?

2

30 sec

Q.

Which was Alex's first crime?

3

30 sec

Q.

Where there any suspects in Charlie's kidnapping?

4

30 sec

Q.

When did Charlie dissappear?

5

30 sec

Q.

There were up to four murderers killing people in 1988

6

30 sec

Q.

John stole the bank alone with a gun, covering his face with a blanket.

7

30 sec

Q.

Margaret poisoned the chocolate cookies to kill her husband

8

30 sec

Q.

The motifs of Alexander were money, fame and reputation.

9

30 sec

Q.

Tina's boss replaced his identity

10

30 sec

Related quizzes

Wrongful convictions
Wrongful Acts
Dred Scott was born enslaved in Virginia in 1799. In 1833, he was purchased by Dr. John Emerson, an army surgeon, living in Missouri. At the time, the U.S. was divided into free states (where slavery was outlawed) and slave states (where slavery was allowed). The Missouri Compromise of 1820 made Missouri a slave state. But it also outlawed slavery in any territory north of it. In 1833, Dr. Emerson was assigned to a fort in Illinois, and later, a fort in the Wisconsin Territory. He took Dred Scott with him. They lived in these areas for years. Even though slavery was outlawed in both places, Emerson never freed Scott. Eventually, Scott was sent back to Missouri to live with Emerson’s wife, Eliza Sanford*. After the doctor died in 1843, Scott tried to buy his freedom. Sanford refused. With the support of his church, abolitionists, and friends, Scott sued to get it. His case ended up going all the way to the Supreme Court. The Arguments Scott sued using two Missouri laws. One said any person held in wrongful enslavement could sue for their freedom. The other stated any person taken to a free territory was automatically free, and could not be re-enslaved. Sanford argued that the Missouri laws applied only to someone moving to free areas by choice. Dr. Emerson was ordered by the army to move to his posts. Sanford also said that military authority was greater than the states’. And since they lived on military bases, Emerson did not have to follow state or territory laws. The Decision In a 7–2 decision, the Court ruled that Dred Scott was not free. Chief Justice Roger Taney stated that all people of African descent, free or enslaved, were not U.S. citizens. They did not have rights, like the power to vote or sue in court, so Scott’s case was invalid. But Taney did not stop there. He added that, because enslaved people were property, the Fifth Amendment protected the rights of enslavers. The Fifth Amendment says the government can’t take someone’s property without going through the courts or paying for it. Laws that banned slavery, like the Missouri Compromise, were unconstitutional. No level of government, Taney said, state or federal, could outlaw slavery.
110.31.b.17.C
Topic: Reading/Vocabulary Development
STAAR English II High School 2014 - Past Paper
110.31.b.1.B
STAAR English I High School 2017 - Past Paper